The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1957 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Does that policy override the legal definition itself within the rules? What happens if there is a legal challenge?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Do you think that it would be difficult to challenge or override the individualised assessment that the SPS would normally allow? Do you feel that you are going to be vulnerable to legal challenge?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Would it be possible—
Sorry, Mr Kerr.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
It is your turn at last, Dr Guyan—you have waited patiently. In your opening statement, you said that data should reflect experience, and that it should reflect who we are and who we want to be. You said that there is too much data—you can correct me if you did not say that; I was a bit shocked when you said it, so I wanted some clarity there. Is it your position that we should now collect only data based on gender ID, and not data on sex?
11:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I was just referencing the specific examples that I gave, which could be about young people seeking help in gender identification clinics, the gender pay gap and all the other issues that I have raised with regard to how we go through our lives, in terms of how that definition forms public policy, creates services and provides help.
11:15Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I have a very small question for Mr Lowe. Can you clarify whether the GRC issued to anyone born in Scotland and aged 16 or over will also be available to anyone born here, but who now lives in another part of the UK?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Do any other members of the panel have a view on the Cass review and how important it is in the context of what we are doing in Scotland? It seems not.
12:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Good morning, panel. First, I ask witnesses to explain their views on the proposal in the bill to lower the age for a GRC from 18 to 16. I ask the Rev Karen Hendry to start. We have heard that the Church of Scotland agrees with discontinuing mandatory assessments but not with lowering the age from 18 to 16. May I have your views, please?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I want to develop that line of questioning. If, for example, the Government reform went through and all the suggestions and policy reforms were passed in the Parliament, would that make you feel uncomfortable about your position of removing the need for an assessment, given that you do not support the lowering of the age to 16? I accept the arguments that you have made. How would you feel about that? How would the church feel about that?