The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1957 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you, Maggie. That confirms what I was reading in the policy note; I just needed some reassurance that my interpretation was correct.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I meant loss of livelihood because of income being affected by loss of livestock.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I think that we might need to work that through. It is a good thing to air as part of the practicalities of improving animal welfare in general.
I will pick up another point. In response to Jim Fairlie, you mentioned that the Scottish Government has assessed the use of two dogs. Can you write to the committee with that detail? Has a document been published?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I have asked this question in consecutive evidence sessions. What would happen if NatureScot was satisfied that there was no alternative method of controlling predators, but it was demonstrated that there had been loss? Can you cite any other scheme or example that would offer compensation for loss of livelihood or livestock?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
There are new requirements to protect the environment and ground-nesting birds, and to increase the biodiversity of species within Scotland. Making an exception, in sections 7 and 8, to the offences when a scheme has “environmental benefit”—rather than considering predation control as part of that—does not consider the fact that, depending on how they decide to do it, land managers might inadvertently protect the environment as a positive consequence of predation control. Do you not think that that should be reflected in how the licence would be applied for and granted, on a general level?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
We are already at stage 1 and there has been no consultation on the licensing scheme as yet. It is therefore difficult to determine whether NatureScot will, with its current reduced budget, be able to fulfil those requirements. Do you think that it might be worth looking at the financial implications in the consultation on the scheme?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
How does the animal welfare improve when you roll in the environmental benefit and the livestock predation at the same time?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
We need to make the bill workable and practical, minister. I know that that is one of your intentions.
You used the term “loopholes”. A loophole can be defined as one person’s perspective of a reasonable defence. That brings in the argument about proving a defence of hare coursing.
Hundreds of people go out on rough shoots, not intending to shoot rabbits, and take more than two dogs. It is slightly strange that we would want to limit the number of dogs for people who are not intending to shoot rabbits.
In addition, there could be a spurious allegation. In such a situation, would that rough shoot be stopped?
Could it be workable to include an exception that covered permission to be on the land? By doing that, if someone has three well-controlled spaniels but something happens and a dog runs off after a rabbit—unintended, of course—we would not have to look at that individual; they would be able to prove their defence. Could we consider an exception in the bill to cover that?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Can I get some clarity on that, convener?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Just for the record, I say that I also support that, but I think that we need to find a workable and practical solution to ensure that the bill is not just a catch-all, if you know what I mean.