The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1476 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
Paul Grice mentioned the potential for intervention. The ultimate stick that the SFC can wield is to claw back funding. In reality that does not happen because, in the situation that may give rise to that intervention, taking money out of that institution is probably one of the worst things that you could do. Some other stakeholders have raised the concern that that is not really an effective stick to wield. It is not an effective enforcement power. Last year, I believe, the previous chief executive of the SFC gave evidence and she hinted that there was a need for the SFC to have a wider range of enforcement or intervention powers. Presumably, you will never want money to be clawed back from your institutions. What would other effective enforcement powers look like from your perspective? What would provide an incentive but still be a realistic option for the SFC in those worst-case scenarios?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
Phiona, I am keen to hear your thoughts on this, too, just before we move on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
I agree with that, absolutely. Before I bring in Paul Grice, in the small number of potential scenarios where there was a rogue institution, to use a perhaps pejorative phase, what would an effective enforcement mechanism be? We can all generally agree that clawback will almost never be the appropriate mechanism, but a rogue institution is a possible scenario. What would be agreeable to Colleges Scotland as an SFC enforcement mechanism?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
I will return to the governance stuff, but given the time, I am going to roll two questions into one, because they are somewhat related.
First, I am interested in hearing your thoughts on the bill’s proposal for an SFC apprenticeship committee and the role that you would expect industry and employers to play on it. Separately, the apprenticeship board is being wound up. How do you think the transition away from that body should be managed? I am not suggesting that it will be a like-for-like move—that is, the committee in SFC will not be a replacement for the board—but, on governance arrangements, I am interested in your thoughts on the apprenticeship committee overall, but specifically the role of industry and employers on it, what you would want to see and how we manage the move away from the winding up of the SAAB.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
Do not feel obliged to answer the question.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
What other actions should be taken in winding up the SAAB to ensure that there is a smooth transition?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
That is great. Thank you very much.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
Thank you. Do you want to comment, Stephanie?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
I will follow up John Mason’s line of questioning, particularly on the information-sharing obligations in the bill. Jon Vincent, in Colleges Scotland’s written submission you suggested that you would want more clarity on exactly what those obligations are. Paul Grice, in your written submission you pointed out some inconsistencies in either the policy memorandum or the explanatory notes between the general principle around when information should be provided and the examples appearing to be at a much lower threshold. The intention is that more detail on those obligations will be provided in the regulations that will come later. Is it your position that you are looking for a statement from the Government giving you a bit of clarity at this time but you are content that the detail will be written down in the regulations, or is there a need to put something a bit more specific in the bill at this point?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Ross Greer
I am conscious of the time, convener, so unless Sai Shraddha Viswanathan or Andrew Ritchie is particularly keen to come in on this one, I am happy to leave it there.