Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 14 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1535 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Scottish Languages Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Ross Greer

I have a couple of questions about amendments 63 and 65, but I thought that they would be best placed in a separate contribution rather than interrupting the flow of the Deputy First Minister’s speech.

In the first instance, can she address the question whether amendments 63 and 65 are compliant with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child? Much as I welcome the amendments overall, the proposed new section 13A of the 2016 act gives parents, but not young people themselves, the ability to make a request. Under the proposed new section 13B, however, young people themselves—“pupils”—can make an input once the process is triggered.

That seems to be a little inconsistent. If we are, under proposed new section 13B, allowing young people to have a role as part of the process, should we not, in particular given that the UNCRC is now part of our domestic law, give them an equivalent ability to make a request under proposed new section 13A?

Miles Briggs made the point that the experience of many parents is that they have to campaign for GME, but by the time they have achieved their aim, their children are no longer in school. Amendment 65 refers specifically to “parents of pupils” who are in school. I wonder whether we could change that to include the parents of pre-school children, who would be more likely to achieve the aim in time for their own children to benefit.

My third question starts with a plea for assistance from the Deputy First Minister to help me to pronounce the name of Comann nam Pàrant, the Gaelic education parents association.

The Law Society of Scotland had some questions about this. Is Comann nam Pàrant established in statute? If it is, I think that it is fine that it is referred to specifically in the proposed new section. If it is not, is it advisable to include in law a specific organisation that is itself not established in law? It could change form, name, status and so on at some point without an act of Parliament, which would then, if the amended bill is passed, require an act of Parliament to be changed.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26 and Economic and Fiscal Forecasts

Meeting date: 10 December 2024

Ross Greer

That was the final question that I wanted to ask. Otherwise it has all been well covered.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26 and Economic and Fiscal Forecasts

Meeting date: 10 December 2024

Ross Greer

My question is on that point, because a lot of the larger substantive issues that I was going to ask about have been well covered already.

It is not about the relative worth or otherwise of the policy, because I understand that that is not for the witnesses to comment on, but about the transparency and presentational issues around things such as the hospitality relief. As you point out, Graeme, a huge number of the businesses that would be eligible for that already receive substantive relief through SBBS, and many of them receive 100 per cent relief. Is there a presentational and transparency challenge here, given that reliefs are layered on top of each other and there is a fragmented NDR relief landscape?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Scottish Qualifications Authority: “Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Ross Greer

That is the core point. On that specific example, I do not have the depth of knowledge about that paper, but I accept that you cannot give marks for an answer to a question that was not asked.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Scottish Qualifications Authority: “Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Ross Greer

Cabinet secretary, although I accept that the SQA’s report was externally quality assured by the Welsh equivalent body, the report is about quality assuring the SQA’s own processes. The SQA came to the conclusion that the issue was not the exam paper or the marking scheme, but unusual underperformance by pupils. If it is not the chief examiner’s role to look into why that was the case, in relation to questions about presentation and so on, where in the system does that responsibility lie? Whose responsibility is it to look into that further?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Scottish Qualifications Authority: “Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Ross Greer

Absolutely—that is something to consider for the wider reform programme, not just for history.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

The Promise (Staff Recruitment and Retention)

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Ross Greer

Yes—hostage to fortune and all that.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

The Promise (Staff Recruitment and Retention)

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Ross Greer

Does anyone else want to come in on case workload?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

The Promise (Staff Recruitment and Retention)

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Ross Greer

It says a lot about how we do governance reform in Scotland that multiple integration processes have led to more fragmentation.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

The Promise (Staff Recruitment and Retention)

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Ross Greer

The Scottish Government would agree with you on the challenge of annual funding settlements, which is also a significant challenge for it.

Do Fiona Duncan or Claire Burns have any final comments on resources before I move on?