The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1589 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
I assume that this would require ministerial direction, but have there been any discussions between the SFC and Corseford College about whether it could become a funded institution?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
Conveniently, the Scottish Government is in next, so we can ask it that question.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
I absolutely take the point about the need for the review and the need to gather evidence. Regardless of the outcome of the review—whether it is that the Corseford model works or that a different one is required—there is an obvious need. Would the Government prefer that that need be met by provision that is funded through the regular SFC funding model—that is, by a recognised SFC-funded institution?
Corseford would say that the funding arrangements that it has are not ideal. There are funding pots coming from various directions and there is a lack of certainty about funding. I give credit to the Liberal Democrats for securing the funding for the coming year, but we should not need to look at it year on year, which happens because the college is separate from regularly SFC-funded institutions. Is the goal to mainstream it into the SFC funding model?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
Fair enough. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
Obviously that process has not yet been carried out, but am I correct, and being fair, in concluding from what you are saying that part of the issue was the point at which you were informed by the institution of the challenges that it was facing, and that perhaps it would have been useful if you had been alerted far earlier?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
I recognise that and appreciate the discussions that we have had in the past. Would the Government be able to put some of the costings and estimates that it has made in the public domain? I am conscious that we have had that conversation, but I was not entirely convinced by the information that was provided, and I do not want to breach confidentiality. It is the Government’s information to put in the public domain, but it would be helpful for us.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
I appreciate that. Given that, what is the Scottish Government’s offer and intention for estranged students? We talked with the SFC in the witness session earlier today and it collects data on this. One of the commitments that it made to collect the data was in response to the only organisation for estranged young people in Scotland having closed last year or the year before, so no one is advocating on behalf of that group. What is the Scottish Government’s intention in supporting them into further and higher education?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
I will follow up on the point about care-experienced young people. Do you collect equivalent data for estranged students?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
I have a specific follow-up question about Corseford College, which I have just contacted the SFC about—that email may or may not have made it to any of you, as I sent it only about 48 hours ago.
Corseford College is a unique institution. At the moment, it is funded not by the SFC but through an arrangement involving a variety of Scottish Government funding pots that have been cobbled together over the years. For that reason, there has been a lack of certainty around the college’s funding.
Corseford provides a unique offering for students who have very complex additional needs, for whom the regular college experience will not be possible. Have you had any discussions, either with the college or with any of the existing institutions that you fund, about how we can increase access for students who have very particular and complex needs?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Ross Greer
I will follow up on Pam Duncan-Glancy’s line of questioning about support for disabled students and disabled people who aspire to be students.
Corseford College provides a unique offering for students who have complex needs and would find it challenging, if not impossible, to attend other colleges. I am aware that there are people who live far outwith reasonable commuting distance of Corseford who regularly get in touch with the college to ask whether it is aware of such an offering being available elsewhere in Scotland. The answer is that there is none: Corseford is unique.
I know that the Scottish Government supports the college and that you have had discussions with it. What wider conversations are you having about an equivalent offering to Corseford’s being available to everyone, regardless of where they live in Scotland? Perhaps that will be wrapped up in the review that you discussed with Pam Duncan-Glancy.