The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1589 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
Much appreciated; thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
If you can provide an update to the committee after that meeting—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
Yes. That would be very helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
I am interested in why the stretch aims use a different measurement compared with the national improvement framework. The local aims use all SCQF qualifications whereas the NIF uses just the NQs. I understand the logic of both approaches and it is more appropriate that the stretch aims take that broader approach. However, is there not a bit of a problem in our using two different measurements?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
Finally, I will ask about another area of spend. You and I had discussions some time ago about the funding of campus police officers through PEF. That is an example of a wider challenge that you have touched on a few times during the meeting, which is that schools are providing all sorts of other services because public services have been stripped away. When it comes to annual budget setting or on-going intragovernmental discussions throughout the year, how do you manage the funding of services that a school might wish to provide?
I have a different view on the value of campus police officers but, at the moment, that service is being funded by the education budget. Would it be better funded by Police Scotland, the NHS or Social Security Scotland? Are there discussions between cabinet secretaries about the most effective way of funding it, which budget should allocate the money and how the spend can be tracked so that we can identify what the money is being spent on? Historically, that has been a challenge in our scrutiny of attainment challenge funding.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
Thank you, cabinet secretary. I would love to pursue that, but I am conscious of time and the fact that I should have been at a meeting with the Presiding Officer five minutes ago. I will slip away in a minute, if that is okay, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
Nico McKenzie-Juetten mentioned a moment ago, and you have just repeated it, cabinet secretary, that this is a routine process and the alternative would be a truncated process. You do not have cross-Government responsibility for board appointments, but are you aware of any situations in which the truncated process has been followed? If this is the norm and we are just following the regular process, are you aware of any examples where that has not been done and the truncated process has had to be followed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
Excellent. That is good to hear.
I am also interested in attendance, which Miles Briggs raised. I am aware that the Children’s Commissioner for England has done a lot of positive work on attendance. Is there anything that we can learn from that? The Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland has had other areas of focus recently, quite legitimately, but some really good work on the subject appears to have taken place in England. I wonder what we could draw from that, given that it is an acute issue but also very much a shared issue, and not just in Scotland and England—it is a wider western problem.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ross Greer
My question is more about how money is spent across Government, rather than the specific debate that you and I have had before about the value of campus cops. Whether SAC funding needs to be used for that purpose is a legitimate question because, putting aside my views on campus cops, could Police Scotland’s budget not be used to directly fund them, given that police officers are being funded?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ross Greer
We have had the landfill tax for a while now, as have Wales and England. Why has the Scottish Government not looked into the potential for a differential rate before this point?