The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1561 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
The MTFS sets out four broad categories for spending. You have already covered quite a bit around public service reform and efficiency. The other two categories are about increasing the value and impact of public spend and preventative spend, which has been a perennial issue that we have discussed with you before.
I have a two-part question on increasing the value of public spending and preventative spend. Looking back at recent MTFSs, have you seen any trajectory of improvement in how the Scottish Government approaches maximising value for public money in its spending and preventative spending? Looking ahead, do you have any evidence that the Government has clear plans to improve its score on both of those counts?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
I agree.
12:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
I am glad to hear that. This is a discussion for another time, and we have talked about it before, but I do not think that it is appropriate that, for example, shooting estates that are owned by some of the wealthiest people in the world benefit from the small business bonus scheme, when there are many genuine small businesses in Scotland that require more support.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
One specific thing beyond the briefing—the UK Government has consulted on it and the direction of travel is clear—is not the abolition or replacement of landfill tax but the significant reform of having a single rate for it. Have you modelled any impact from the proposals that are in the UK Government’s consultation?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
I was proud to vote for all those budgets and proud that my party collaborated with yours on them. We have made significant progress compared with the rest of the UK, but all the efforts that we have made so far have got us only to this point, where the top 2 per cent own more than the bottom 50 per cent. Clearly, there is a need to go further. I am looking for a sense of what the Scottish Government thinks those next steps are.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
I appreciate that. I was not specifically heading to a wealth tax proposal, although I agree with everything that you said about the support for it in principle and the practical challenges of implementing it. However, I take it from your answer that the Scottish Government is not satisfied with the current levels of wealth inequality in Scotland.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
It is a few million pounds, but I suggest that it is a few million pounds that would be better spent elsewhere.
I will move on to another area. High levels of inequality are harmful to public finances because they are harmful to the economy at large. Normal people spend their money in the economy, which generates tax revenue and has a net positive effect. The very wealthiest people in society tend to be less productive with their wealth. Much of it is offshored or holed up in assets that are not used productively. Last week, you published statistics showing that the richest 2 per cent of households in Scotland have more wealth than the bottom 50 per cent combined. In the Scottish Government’s view, is that an unacceptable level of wealth inequality?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
It seems that I am putting on my greatest hits, so I have one more, which was teed up by what you said about the Opposition parties’ response any time that something is put forward.
I have every sympathy with the Government’s position at budget time, when Opposition parties demand increased spending but will not say where the money should come from. You have heard me say that the highest quality budget debate that we have ever had in the Parliament was in 2017-18, when the Government invited all parties to put forward tax proposals and have them costed by the SFC. Given that there is only one budget left before the next election, will the Government take that same approach and invite all five Opposition parties to publish their own proposals, so that they can all be costed by the SFC and, at that point, scrutinised by the Parliament?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Ross Greer
Okay. It was worth a try.