The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1370 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2021
Ross Greer
Thank you for that answer. I have no doubt that ministers are going into this in a far greater level of detail than just that top-line measurement. However, to go back to John Mason’s line of questioning, if we are trying to get wider buy-in from the public, the various levels of the state and the third sector, is there not a question about whether that measurement is a useful presentation for those who are engaging only at a surface level?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2021
Ross Greer
Given that both processes feed into the same framework, how do we prevent them becoming siloed?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2021
Ross Greer
My final question is on the role of transport in the NPF. The one obvious transport indicator is the active travel one that we have just mentioned. Transport is tangentially related to a couple of others: greenhouse gas emissions and public satisfaction with public services, for which public transport is mentioned. However, it seems to be the one major area of Government responsibility that is not directly addressed. Health education, environment and economy are all categories under which groups of outcomes are measured. Transport is not one of those categories. It has that one specific indicator on active travel but in everything else it is just tangentially related to an indicator.
Given the importance of transport for our net zero ambitions, in particular, and the challenges in reducing emissions from transport compared with all other sectors, do you have any concern that the NPF is perhaps not taking transport into account to the extent that is needed in order to reach those wider outcomes?
11:15Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2021
Ross Greer
I have a question on the two upcoming processes that will affect the performance framework, one of which is the review of national outcomes. The Government has also confirmed that the proposed wellbeing and sustainable development bill will have some effect on the NPF. Can you explain how those two processes will interact? Will it be sequential, so that drafting of the bill will take place only after the review of national outcomes, or will the processes overlap and interact?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ross Greer
The discussion on the difficult choices that need to be made has very much focused on what to cut or disinvest from, but there are other difficult choices that Government and Parliament can make with regard to how we raise additional revenue and who we raise it from. I have a pretty open-ended question for you. I recognise that they create a separate set of challenges from that presented by simply reducing budgets, but what revenue-raising opportunities will there be over the next couple of years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ross Greer
Thank you. That is all from me.
11:45Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ross Greer
There was an allocation of £45 million to local authorities a bit earlier this year—I cannot remember exactly when, but it was certainly in the previous financial year—to bring additional resources such as teachers and support staff into schools, as a result of Covid. Since then, there has been a lot of political debate about the need to move teachers who are on temporary contracts on to permanent contracts. Have you had any indication that the £45 million will be baselined into the local government settlement in future? It is hard to see how we can move folk on temporary contracts that were funded from a one-off pot on to permanent contracts if the money is not baselined into the settlement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ross Greer
My first question is probably for Gail Macgregor. Your submission makes what sounds like an entirely sensible point about the advantage if the review of the UK’s fiscal framework was to include consideration of the local government fiscal framework that is being developed. However, that begs a question of sequencing. I apologise if the information is already in the public domain and I should know it but, in the first instance, what timescale are you working to with the development of the local government fiscal framework?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ross Greer
My next question is about local government reserves, so it might be best directed to Alan Russell in the first instance. Have council reserves been disproportionately drawn down since the most recent set of numbers that I have seen, which were in the 2019-20 Audit Scotland paper? Your submission makes a point about the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on communities, individuals and families who were already disadvantaged, particularly those who were socioeconomically disadvantaged. Have the local authorities that have higher rates of socioeconomic deprivation had a disproportionately higher need to draw down from their reserves?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ross Greer
I have no relevant interests to declare.