The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 548 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
What is your expectation? Do you expect grades to return to normal?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
However, do you think that the initial recommendation—to move the exam assessment part of our system in with the curriculum part—is right?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
Do you not think that, in fairness, learners deserve to know whether their grades are likely to reflect those from previous years or those from the two exceptional years with which you have said that comparisons cannot be made?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
I am not asking about ministers. Given your professional experience as someone who has headed up Scotland’s exam body, if anyone was going to stand up for exams and make the case that what we are doing at the moment is right, it would probably be you. Is there another side to the story that the Parliament should think about? Do you think that those recommendations are right?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
My final question reflects on one of those issues, although I am not enthusiastic about asking it. I absolutely believe that all young people deserve the grades that they have got in the past two years, and people feel positive about seeing young people from more challenging backgrounds do better than they have in the past. I would like to see that continue, but are there unintended consequences of grade inflation? Do you think that we should be mindful of that?
It is not a popular subject to talk about, but does that bring other challenges with regard to what a qualifications body should be doing? That goes back to my previous question about whether—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
In 2020, you pushed for the algorithmic element to keep grades where they would have been expected to be. Do you think that that is important in the system—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
They are worse than the grades in 2020.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
So, over the year, we have had more time to get the ACM organised and, in that time, people from the most challenging communities have been disadvantaged. Is that the case, or has the system just adjusted back to what we would normally see?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
And no one was going to second guess it? It sounds to me as though the process was trying to arrive at the grades you would have expected.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Oliver Mundell
I want to return to the earlier line of questioning. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Education conducted a review of what local authorities were doing in terms of the ACM, and it found that most local authorities had developed bespoke data analysis tools to support school-level quality assurance, which were used to check against three and five-year data trends. That information was then used to identify and address any unexpected provisional grades. Is that your understanding of what happened across the country?