The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 548 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
I recognise up front your personal commitment to getting the scheme through in the previous session of the Parliament, and I know that there was some time pressure with regard to ensuring that that work did not go to waste. However, on some of the issues around the delays and the challenges of processing the applications, I feel that it is right to press you on the modelling and how we modelled that.
10:30Today, you have mentioned three factors involved in the delays, and I think that there is a fourth factor, for which, as a Parliament, we are collectively responsible, which is expectation management. Survivors thought, with regard to these applications and the principles that we set out, that things might move a bit quicker than they have. We must always be cautious about that, but, with regard to the modelling, where did the idea that people would take longer to put in their applications come from? We have looked at comparator schemes elsewhere as part of drawing up the legislation, so how did we get that modelling wrong?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
It is about 8 per cent of people.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
It is about one in 12.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
I am probably testing the committee’s patience, but this issue is important to me.
I want to follow on from Stephanie Callaghan’s question, as I have come across the same issue with people accessing statements and reports. I understand the sensitivity around that, and I fully appreciate the answer that you gave, but would it be fair to say that, when the bill was passed, it was not the Government’s expectation that the restriction order would be in place?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
It could be a promotion.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
On your previous comments, what vested interests do you think that the Faculty of Advocates and the Equality and Human Rights Commission have in raising concerns about the appropriateness of a framework bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
I suggested to you in my previous question that the faculty has concerns about the appropriateness of the bill as the mechanism for bringing matters forward and you replied that some of the organisations that have been critical of the bill have vested interests. Are you saying that you were not referring to the evidence of the faculty or the Equality and Human Rights Commission?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
Have you read those organisations’ submissions?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
That is helpful. It has always been my understanding that, although parliamentarians can speak to ministers, raise points and do other things to impact the wording of regulations, they have no power to change what regulations say. That is a fundamental concern. That differs from primary legislation, where any member of the Parliament can propose changes to the wording of a bill.
That leads me to a final question. MSPs can only amend what is in the bill. If we have less information in the bill, there is less opportunity to amend the wording, which dictates the meaning of the legislation. Is that correct, minister?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
I have heard the point that the minister has made regarding an open-door policy. During my time in Parliament I have always found the minister easy to work with on issues. However, with the best will in the world, part of the problem here is that you cannot guarantee that you will be the minister making the decisions. We face that issue time and again when we are considering other powers and legislation. The promises that you make as a minister today are only as good as the time that you spend in this particular office. My worry is that we are handing over to ministers quite wide-ranging powers on a very significant piece of legislation. Ordinarily, we would expect this kind of bill to have much more detail. Do you not think that that is a problem?