The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 529 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
My concern is that we could end up in a situation in which the Parliament says that it is okay to proceed but in which the Lord President says that it is not. I would like to get a sense of how big a problem you think that would be. I fear the politicisation of the Lord President’s role. As you said, Parliament is here to make the law. Parliament might think that something should be the law of the land, but the judiciary might block that. Are there examples of the Lord President having that sort of role in other areas of the law? How might an impasse like that affect the legal profession?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
No answer at all?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
You have made strong representations at the meeting and throughout the process. Do you get any sense that the Government is listening to that feedback? What is the engagement on the issue? Given that you have said that it is “No, no, no” for you, is there a sense that that is being listened to?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
So you do not have a firm view on the specific delegated powers.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
I do not deny that. I just felt that it was important to clarify that the sector is probably still a bit more diverse than just 16 firms.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
Yes, I have a question about section 5. I want to understand the evolution of the regulatory objectives and professional principles. The Government is saying that the power in section 5 is needed because that would be a more efficient way of making any changes that are needed in the future. What is the timescale over which the current objectives and principles emerged? How quickly does strategic change happen?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
That is helpful. I was just trying to understand the position, because the memorandum talks about changing circumstances. Over that longer period, there have been lots of changing circumstances and, if the principles have generally remained constant, I would just like to understand the efficiency argument for changing them. However, that is more of a comment than a question.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
What would that look like, as a process? You mentioned having a statement of reasons. I am just trying to understand where that would fit in. Obviously, all secondary legislation that comes to the Parliament comes with an explanation from the Government, setting out the need for it at the time.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
Sorry to interrupt, but have you asked for any more information from the Government?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Oliver Mundell
I want to push a bit more on framework bills. They give ministers and the Government increased flexibility, but Parliament loses something in the process. I know that there is always a trade-off between Parliament and Government—I accept that—but as an individual member of the Parliament I worry about my ability to influence the likes of the proposed agriculture bill on behalf of my constituents. If everything is in secondary legislation, the chance to lodge amendments, to have them voted on and to have a transparent debate and process is limited. That changes the nature of the debate and negotiation on a policy. One example is that the committee’s members—or a majority of the members of the committee—had the same view on the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill. What is your reflection on that, as a parliamentarian?