The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 548 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Oliver Mundell
I welcome those comments on trying to get things right. I want to ask about some of the historical commitments that the Scottish Government has made. One is in relation to an amendment to the Scotland Act 1998 (Specification of Functions and Transfer of Property etc) Order 2019 (SSI 2019/183). Has there been any progress on that that you can share with the committee?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Oliver Mundell
I think that there are a few others that are outstanding.
10:15Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Oliver Mundell
I come back to the issue of explanatory notes. I note that you said that some of it is down to the eye of the beholder, but a lot of different ministers across Government introduce a lot of different bills. I want to push you a wee bit on what is being done to ensure that there is a common understanding of what is needed in explanatory notes. We have heard that some conveners think that there is too much in explanatory notes and some too little, and the Parliament has the opportunity to say that, but there has recently been a degree of variation. I know that there is a balance to be struck, but is someone working across the Government to ensure that all bills—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Oliver Mundell
I hear what you are saying about flexibility and that some people will always be unhappy, but do you recognise that there is a challenge when such discussions are taking place away from the Parliament? Some stakeholders worry that the people who have louder voices, who are able to lobby harder, who have more professional support, or who might be perceived to be closer to the Government politically, might have a better chance of getting what they want through that process than those stakeholders would if it went to Parliament as a whole and were subjected to the full scrutiny of primary legislation.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Oliver Mundell
Do you recognise that there is a tension there? Whether or not you think that the process works well, there is a tension.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Oliver Mundell
I take the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Bill as an example. We have a Government-initiated question that sets out that 70 per cent of funding for that would go into tier 1 and 2 as direct payments. That decision has been taken by the Government before the stakeholder consultation formally begins. That is possible to do while the bill is going through, but it is not possible to get some of the other information on details that you would normally expect to see in a bill. The Government is picking and choosing which—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Oliver Mundell
The last thing I will say on this is that you can put it in the bill while the bill is going through Parliament and retain the flexibility to change it later. That is different from not including it in the bill at all and leaving it to secondary legislation.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Oliver Mundell
I am happy for us to report the instrument on those grounds, but it is regrettable that the 28-day breach occurred, given the statements by the First Minister in the chamber. There was sufficient time to introduce the legislation earlier, given that, in essence, it replicates legislation in England and Wales.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Oliver Mundell
Thank you, convener. I have no relevant interests to declare.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Oliver Mundell
Thank you, convener, and good morning to committee members. I should say up front that I am not an expert on nuclear science, but I am clear, as an MSP with a legacy nuclear site in my constituency, that such sites are significant and they have a continued social, economic and environmental impact, as do other aspects of the civil nuclear industry across Scotland.
I and a number of the other members who are interested in forming the group consider that the area does not currently get the scrutiny or interest at Holyrood that it merits. We recognise that there is no collective view across the Parliament on the future of nuclear policy. However, a large number of people are employed in the sector and there will continue to be a significant nuclear footprint in Scotland for decades to come.
We are trying to create a space in which the policy issues affecting communities and individuals whom we represent can be explored in more detail. Our intention is to focus initially on those aspects in which cross-party support exists—skills and skill shortages, the supply chain and the role for communities in shaping the future of existing nuclear sites. We are also particularly keen to explore and highlight decommissioning work. The decommissioning sector will be a major employer and will have a significant economic and environmental impact in Scotland.
I am happy to take any questions that the committee might have. I am hopeful that the group will work well and will be an opportunity to create the forum that we refer to in our purpose statement.