Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 9 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1737 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“NHS in Scotland: Spotlight on governance”

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jamie Greene

Right. Has anyone who has run a board that has had such high-level escalation or intervention moved to another board?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“NHS in Scotland: Spotlight on governance”

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jamie Greene

Yes, please check that and write to us.

We talked a little bit in the earlier session about the importance of the role of the non-executive board in holding the executive to account in any public body or organisation. If someone has been part and parcel of that organisation for a long period of time, although I can see that they may bring knowledge and experience of that sector to their non-exec role, are they simply too close to the system and the people involved in it to be able to hold them properly to account in terms of governance arrangements?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“NHS in Scotland: Spotlight on governance”

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jamie Greene

Yes, we heard some good examples of that as well, which is great. There is, however, an issue. There is a 25 per cent failure rate in the first round of recruitment at the highest level. That is one in four vacancies where there is a failure to appoint a candidate. That is an extremely high number relative to other parts of the public sector. Why is it so bad?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“NHS in Scotland: Spotlight on governance”

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Jamie Greene

Yes, the aspiring chairs programme was mentioned and it seems to be reaping some degree of success as a pipeline generating new entrants and bringing people up the chain. That is particularly helpful.

However, the issues of time commitment and remuneration were first brought up in the 2021 survey. We are four years on from that. Those are not new issues, yet many boards are still struggling.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Cairngorm Funicular Railway

Meeting date: 17 September 2025

Jamie Greene

It sounds as though you undertook an interesting due diligence process. What is the shelf life of the funicular once it is fully remediated? When will you have to start thinking about replacement?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 17 September 2025

Jamie Greene

I will begin with a general question. The cycle 1 flood schemes were identified 10 years ago. There were 40 schemes in the plan, the cost of delivering which was estimated to be around £350 million at the time. You now estimate that cost to be around £1 billion, which is a lot of money. Is that your estimate of how much it would cost to deliver the 40 schemes if they were to be delivered in full today, or is that the amount that you understand that the Government has now allocated to their completion? It is a lot of money.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 17 September 2025

Jamie Greene

What about contractors? I cannot get my head around how such a large sum of money has not gone on building flood defences or supporting communities. That is my point.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 17 September 2025

Jamie Greene

Understood. I am not passing comment on the decision that was made; I simply want to understand the diligence process by which those decisions are made. I know for sure that, if I lived in a community that had been ravaged by a flood, and a defence scheme should have been there but was not, and I then discovered that the local council had diverted money to cover other shortfalls, I would not be an overly happy resident. I am sure that many people are not happy about that.

I point to exhibit 7 in your report, which is a table. It is clear that the Scottish Government is spending significant amounts of money on the issue of flooding, and that that has increased since 2017. In that year, the figure was £42 million, and councils also spent £42 million on the issue. In 2023-24, which is the last year in the table, that figure had increased to £60 million. However, the same graph shows that councils’ expenditure was nearer £80 million, so there is a delta of nearly £20 million there. How did that come about? Do you know whether that shortfall was made up or covered by councils dipping into other parts of their budgets to fund that difference?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Cairngorm Funicular Railway

Meeting date: 17 September 2025

Jamie Greene

So, it will cover anything over £18 million—is that correct?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Cairngorm Funicular Railway

Meeting date: 17 September 2025

Jamie Greene

It is important; we are talking about public money.