The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1514 contributions
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
I accept the point that it is not the job of the auditor to assist the body in the preparation of accounts—and rightly so. That opens up questions that are perhaps more for the permanent secretary, for example on how the Government can support those bodies in preparing accounts, which would make your job 10 times easier.
My final question is directed towards the outgoing chair of the board. It would be remiss of me to let the evidence session end without referring back to your opening comments, which were quite stark. You made three specific points in your opening statement, but number 1 on that list was your wider analysis of the direction of travel of many of the public bodies that Audit Scotland audits. You used some interesting and specific phrases—quite stark ones—and I noted them down. I thought that you might want the chance to elaborate on your point before we end the session.
For example, you used the phrase
“business as usual is not an option”,
you talked about “radical” change and you said that certain things are “no longer sustainable” and so on. You clearly have your own personal views on that. In general, that is quite worrying language to hear. Could I give you the opportunity to share your thoughts on how you have come to these stark conclusions?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
I have two supplementary questions. I will draw my line of questioning to a close by taking you right back to both of your opening statements. Auditor General, I will start with you. You mentioned something that I picked up in the opening pages of the annual report, which is the challenges that you face with other public bodies not preparing their accounts on time or properly. You expand on that quite eloquently on page 1. You seem to imply, and you can correct me if I am wrong, that many of the challenges that you face in concluding audits on time are a direct result of other public bodies—to use the phraseology in your report—facing
“significant disruption, including those who monitor and report on their own bodies’ spending.”
What is the issue, and how can we support those public bodies more?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
I have no relevant interests to declare.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
I understand. For clarity, there is a pension element to the proportionately higher increase for some of the senior directors and senior management, which accounts for that higher figure. Do you believe that the organisation acts as fairly and squarely as it can act across the board, with regard to pay rises?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
Do you find that most of your staff come from other audit companies? Is there poaching between the public and private sectors in that regard, as we see in other areas of the public sector?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
I presume that .you cover the costs of their training. You said that around half of those people stay in the business, but the other half presumably do not. What are the governance arrangements around the costs of training?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
Do you get the impression that the issue is that the organisations in question simply do not have the capacity, or that they do not take the issue seriously enough? In some sectors, the delays are quite stark. Given that a huge amount of public money goes into those bodies, that raises eyebrows, if nothing else.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
In the interest of time, we may need to move on, as other members have questions.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
I want to pick up on a few issues that have come up, particularly the variation between in-house auditing and that done by external auditors. Do you have any statistical information that could allow us to compare performance or completion against targets, for example? That would give us a feel for whether external auditors are more on target than your internal teams, or not, as the case may be.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Jamie Greene
I ask you to stick to the timeliness of completion, as I have some other questions about that.