The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1514 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Jamie Greene
Yes, but you could summarise the options that were open to you, so that we can get to how you came to the decision that you made.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Jamie Greene
I am sorry, but I will stop you there for a second, because there is a lot in this. Did the Scottish Government approve the business case or not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Jamie Greene
So the section 22 report was the trigger for you to have concerns about culture and behaviour at WICS. Did nothing that happened before that raise any red flags?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Jamie Greene
You are welcome to push back on the cabinet secretary’s comments, but do you accept her comments and agree that you failed to follow due process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Jamie Greene
Ms Quinn, are you satisfied with that response?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Jamie Greene
Thank you for that update. In the interests of time, my final question is to the Scottish Government. Responsibility for public bodies and the oversight of the boards that oversee the public bodies is a matter for the sponsor division, the director general of those directorates and, ultimately, ministers and cabinet secretaries. It sounds like there has been a catalogue and a litany of extreme failures of fiscal governance across a taxpayer-funded body. When did the Scottish Government think that things were going wrong at WICS? When did it get an idea that there were issues? Was it solely the work of Audit Scotland that raised those flags?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Jamie Greene
Let us go through this in a logical order. That is important, because I am trying to get to the nub of the decision making. After coming to that conclusion, what happened next? Did you seek approval from the Scottish Government, in accordance with the Scottish public finance manual?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Jamie Greene
Good morning to you, Auditor General, and your colleagues. I will start with a question that is less about the specific content of the report and more about the overarching theme that you want us to take away from it.
On the one hand, I am getting the impression that, as the committee often hears with such reports, we are pushing the Government to go further and faster on public service reform. It is said that too many public services still involve clunky, physical, paper-based systems that are not digitised and not modern in ways that they could and should be. On the other hand, though, we seem to be beating the Government with a stick for moving too fast and leaving people behind.
I am therefore not quite sure what the overarching theme of this report is. Is it that the Government is going too fast and needs to take people with it, or is it that it needs to pick up the pace of digital reform while not leaving people behind—or is it perhaps both?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Jamie Greene
That timeline is stark. To put a pin point on it, when I joined the Parliament in 2016, I sat in a committee room not far from here, in which we discussed the procurement of the reaching 100 per cent—R100—programme, yet your report points to the fact that around 10 per cent of people still do not have access to the internet. Some eight years—nearly a decade—on from that time, a large chunk of people do not have digital skills or digital access. That speaks for itself.
Is there any particular reason why progress on the R100 programme—which means, presumably, reaching 100 per cent of the population—was not quite included in this report? I appreciate that there is some overlap with some of the work that Ofcom has been doing, but surely the infrastructure needs to be there before you can start teaching people the skills to use it.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Jamie Greene
Obviously, addressing the associated effects of rural depopulation and tackling digital exclusion are key drivers to repopulating rural and island communities.
This is perhaps a more macro question. Was there any expectation in the draft report that some of those issues might have been addressed in the human rights bill that we expected to see in the programme for government? Is there any feeling of disappointment that that has not featured in the Government’s legislative plans? What effect will that have on the ability to ensure that everyone in Scotland is digitally included?