The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1619 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Jamie Greene
If I was being pessimistic, I would say that it sounds like you are looking for reasons to pay bonuses that are not based on financial performance. The bank has turned a financial corner only this financial year but I presume that you have been paying bonuses for a number of years at a high level.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Jamie Greene
Forgive me if I am wrong, but I got the impression from one of your earlier answers that you want to be free from the shackles of public sector pay constraints to allow you to recruit more aggressively, pay better and give better terms and conditions or to act as a quasi-commercial bank.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Jamie Greene
It would be helpful if you could write to us with that information.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Jamie Greene
It would just save me having to submit a freedom of information request, to be honest.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Jamie Greene
My final question concerns an issue that arose when we spoke to the Audit Scotland team, and it will lead into the final set of questions, which concern the balance of investments. That is an area that is of interest to me because of my discussions with a number of stakeholders who have engaged with the bank.
The Auditor General’s report states that 92 per cent of investees are small and medium-sized enterprises. On the face of it, that sounds quite positive, but that is not the same as 92 per cent of investments. Can you give me the figures on that latter point? How much money do you invest in small and medium-sized businesses in Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Jamie Greene
I raise the issue because, when the Audit Scotland team presented evidence to us on the report, we heard that it had arisen in their feedback sessions with industry. One of the witnesses said:
“I will highlight some feedback from the financial services sector that said that the bank could sometimes take more risks to support scalable businesses, particularly in the tech sector, to improve Scotland’s productivity.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 28 May 2025; c 12.]
Is that something that you would consider doing?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Jamie Greene
I can work only with what I have in front of me, and the summary does not go into much detail.
You are right that the approved budget in the “Other” line was £578,000, while the actual spend was £121,000. As you have said, that could be because you have, in year, been able to distribute some of that money elsewhere, but it is quite hard to follow that.
On the obverse, the approved depreciation budget was £430,000, but according to the table, the spend turned out to be nearly £1 million, or 126 per cent over. Again, is that just a case of money being shifted around?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Jamie Greene
Richard Leonard is welcome to come back in on that point if he wishes.
This is an interesting area. I was under the impression that you have fixed fee rates for external organisations that, if I recall correctly, are subject to reasonably lengthy contracts. The sheer level of the rise in external fees surprised me, though: it is nearly £1.7 million above what was budgeted. Are you saying that that rise has been driven not by understaffing issues in your organisation but by the clients that you manage?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Jamie Greene
As a side question to that, in our earlier session we talked particularly about some of the costs involved, but I know that it has been a bit of a tough slog for many public organisations to try to bring people back together and get people back into the office. Is there a direction of travel on that for your organisation? Has it stabilised? Are you still trying to encourage people, particularly your auditors, to work face to face more? Has there been any resistance to that?
12:00Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Jamie Greene
Good morning. Continuing with this conversation, I note that the panel has talked once or twice about very “robust” budget-setting processes. I might take a slightly different line, based on the table that I have in front of me.
Among the things that concern me most is the high degree of variance between what you have budgeted for and what you have spent in quite a wide range of lines in the budget table that I am looking at. We are not talking about a small margin, either; I appreciate that there is a realm of acceptability when it comes to budget variance, but the numbers vary quite wildly. I will get into a few of them in a moment, but in many, the variance is over the 50 per cent mark. Please do not take this the wrong way, but in what way does that represent a good budgeting process?