Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 31 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1731 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

Moving on to another strategic investment that is under your control, has the Scottish Government undertaken any current analysis of developments with regard to Liberty Steel?

Mr Irwin, you will be aware of yesterday’s media reports about attempts to adjourn a winding-up petition that was lodged by one of Speciality Steel UK Ltd’s creditors and could result in it being forcibly moved into compulsory liquidation. Given that the Scottish Government has had and still has interactions with the company, is that a risk?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

That is helpful. Just to be clear, at the moment, there is no identified immediate risk of the Scottish Government being a creditor to that business, if it is liquidated. Is that correct?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

Any interventions.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

Good morning. I have a supplementary question on the first line of questioning. Mr Irwin, in response to one of the earlier questions, you stated—and correct me if I am wrong—that you have full confidence in the board of FMPG, including its current chair. Will you qualify that and explain how you have come to that conclusion, given the yard’s inability to compete in the open market for new business and its cost overruns, which, I am sure, other members will want to address? Do you believe that the current board at the yard is creating a sustainable future for it? If so, will you qualify that and explain how you have come to that conclusion?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

Forgive me if I am wrong, but I am getting a sense that there is a reticence on your part to admit that, if things were not going in the right direction, you would be unwilling to criticise the board, because that would be a reflection on your input and a measure of your failure, as the strategic commercial asset division. As you are so heavily invested in the strategy and the business model, if that fails, you have failed. Therefore, you would not be willing to go on record and criticise the board. At what point would you sack the board, or when would you recommend that ministers should sack the board, if you were unhappy that the business was not run to its full ability?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

I want to get this straight, because £35 million is a lot of money—it is nearly the original planned cost of the whole vessel, and it is on top of what has already been spent. We are talking about some really big numbers. I am trying to get my head around what is driving that huge overrun. There must be an elephant in the room. Something must be driving such a massive cost overrun. Is it something that was installed that does not work? Is it something that has not been installed but which is now defunct? Is it the cost of the people? I have no idea whether the overrun involves capital expenditure or resource spending. At the end of the day, it is public money, so we surely have a right to understand what the yard is asking for.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

It is unfortunate that it spent that money and did not get the contracts.

Did anyone in the Scottish Government advise ministers to directly award any of those contracts? For example, presumably it would have been in the interests of the yard to be given the small vessel replacement programme work. Did SCAD offer any advice to ministers about whether they should directly award that work and, if so, what was the ministers’ response?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

Is that not strange, though? Would SCAD not want the yard to get work? Did you not make representations either to CMAL or to the transport division of the Scottish Government?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

You talk about continuity and stability, but the yard is on its fourth chief executive since it was nationalised; that is not exactly stability.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Jamie Greene

I have a lot of ground to cover, so I will try to rattle through it. I am sorry if I revisit earlier subjects—that is just the nature of questions.

I have some unanswered questions on Ferguson Marine. Has anyone in the Scottish Government, particularly in your divisions, asked Ferguson Marine what exactly it needs £35 million for?