The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1514 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
You talked about a couple of potential orders. I recall my first visit to the yard, in 2016, when I sat with the then owner of the yard in the boardroom, where I am sure you have had a number of meetings over the years. I was given a very lengthy presentation about the pipeline of business that it was pitching and bidding for and the business that it was in advanced conversations about. To my knowledge, not one of those possibilities came to fruition or came to pass due to the situation that the yard found itself in, the receivership and eventual nationalisation. The list of business that it was pitching for was very long.
You mentioned that there are potentially a couple of contracts coming through. What I am getting at is whether, when the Glen Rosa sets sail later this year, we hope, there will still be 290 people working in the yard. Will there be enough business to keep them in work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Are you saying that you can be beaten on price because Turkey and countries in Asia and in the middle east will build ships cheaper, for many different reasons, including reasons that perhaps we would not agree with, such as the conditions for their workforce, how much they pay their staff, and their health and safety records—the things that we like to excel at in our shipbuilding community in Scotland? Therefore, is your plea to the Government that, that issue aside, it should look at the wider macroeconomic benefits of putting this work into Inverclyde? Is that what you are saying?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Well, the time is now. I am asking whether that is the current intention.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
That is great. My final question is on the finances that were mentioned earlier. I am looking for reassurance that funding for any cost overruns that the yard identifies as arising in the next couple of weeks or months will be met through additional funds provided by the Scottish Government. None of that should come from the money that has been put aside for capital investment to improve and upgrade the yard or from any other part of its existing budget.
I mention that because it is exactly what happened last time. The Scottish Government gave the yard money, by way of loans, for the stated purpose of improving its infrastructure. We all know that that money got soaked up in the Glen Sannox cost overruns—that was the reality of the matter—and I am looking for comfort that that will not be the case again.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us get this right. The budget, if it is agreed to, will allocate around £47 million to the yard, of which £37 million will be used to complete the Glen Rosa, and there is £14 million of capital money. Also, £9 million of the capital money will be allocated to the Glen Rosa. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Perhaps you can write to us and outline that. We asked Audit Scotland about that previously, and there was a lot of confusion over the numbers.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us segue nicely to the Scottish Government. Would that request be granted?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
I am sure that Mr McMillan is more than capable of agreeing with many of those points, and I am sure that we will hear some of them from him. As someone who lives in Greenock, I agree with many of the points that I am sure that he is about to make, but that is not the point of this committee, and it is not the point of the Auditor General’s work. That specific work, rightly, involves holding to account senior civil servants, ministers and people who run enterprises that are owned by the public, funded by the public and paid for with taxpayers’ money. We are entirely doing our duty in that respect.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
There is a track record of your having said to ministers that something is not value for money for public investment.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
In your opening statement, you said that the three pillars of being a good sponsor of a public asset such as Ferguson’s are good governance, transparency and value for money. Which of those is demonstrated in the conversation that we have had today? We have heard numerous examples of poor governance and there has been a lack of transparency, with basic questions that cannot be answered. Certainly, value for money is out the window. The ferries were supposed to cost £97 million for the two, but we are now nudging towards £400 million of public money. Is that a complete failure on your part?