The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1837 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jamie Greene
Right. Has anyone who has run a board that has had such high-level escalation or intervention moved to another board?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jamie Greene
Yes, please check that and write to us.
We talked a little bit in the earlier session about the importance of the role of the non-executive board in holding the executive to account in any public body or organisation. If someone has been part and parcel of that organisation for a long period of time, although I can see that they may bring knowledge and experience of that sector to their non-exec role, are they simply too close to the system and the people involved in it to be able to hold them properly to account in terms of governance arrangements?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jamie Greene
Yes, we heard some good examples of that as well, which is great. There is, however, an issue. There is a 25 per cent failure rate in the first round of recruitment at the highest level. That is one in four vacancies where there is a failure to appoint a candidate. That is an extremely high number relative to other parts of the public sector. Why is it so bad?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jamie Greene
Yes, the aspiring chairs programme was mentioned and it seems to be reaping some degree of success as a pipeline generating new entrants and bringing people up the chain. That is particularly helpful.
However, the issues of time commitment and remuneration were first brought up in the 2021 survey. We are four years on from that. Those are not new issues, yet many boards are still struggling.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jamie Greene
Let me bring you back to some financial questions. Mr Black, you have stated three times over the course of this morning—it is also in your written submission—that you are keen to stress that Balfour Beatty has absorbed the cost of the remediation work on the funicular. I presume that Balfour Beatty has not sprouted a charitable arm. In what circumstances is it undertaking that work? Presumably, it was paid to do it—that is why you are telling us that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jamie Greene
It was paid to do the job, and it is doing the job, but who paid for it? Where did the £18 million come from?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jamie Greene
You get the crux of my question, though. A huge chunk of public money has been paid to a private contractor to deliver the project and get it up to speed. It is clear that some work is still going on, although you say that it is minor rather than substantive. My point is that, as the Public Audit Committee, we are trying to work out what the overall potential liability to the public purse is.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jamie Greene
I appreciate that, and thank you for the additional information.
In the light of the convener’s previous question, if the costs of starting afresh, rebuilding or building a new funicular were established, it sounds to me that the cost of doing the remediation was double the cost of putting in a new funicular. Who made the decision to remediate and why?
10:30Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jamie Greene
I can certainly attest to that because, a few times in the past few years, I have turned up in my Mazda Bongo to find that there is nowhere to park it and skiing is off because of the weather. After a very long drive up there, we just drove back home again. That is probably the experience of many people, particularly in the domestic market. When people make the effort to go up there in the morning when the weather is posted as being okay, and it takes a turn and the cafe shuts really early, which it did when I turned up, there is just nothing else to do. We all left. How do you convince people like that to come back?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Jamie Greene
That is helpful, and it is good to hear. I hope that word of mouth will help to propagate traffic.
I have one final question about the long-term vision, and it might be a joint question for you and HIE. Investment has been very much piecemeal, for obvious reasons, because of the remediation works and adding bits to the resorts to improve it, such as car parking, the potential toboggan run and other improvements. It does not sound like a long-term strategy with a big-ticket ask at the top of it. What is the long-term plan? What sort of numbers are you looking at for long-term investment to ensure that, in 20 to 30 years, there is still a buoyant, self-sufficient, popular and busy resort?