The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 447 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Donald Cameron
Professor Hunt and Professor McEwen, in paragraph 1.10 of your written submission, in relation to common frameworks, you say:
“Depending on their scope and content ... common framework agreements could commit the Scottish Government to shared or minimal standards and rules, potentially limiting the scope for action of the Scottish Parliament.”
What do you mean by that? I think that Professor McEwen referred to downsides to common frameworks. What do you mean by
“limiting the scope for action”
for Parliament?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Donald Cameron
I think that we all accept that we are at an early stage in the process but, gazing into the crystal ball and looking to the future, do you foresee that, in practice, common frameworks will be used in the vast majority of cases and that the internal market act will become a fallback when the frameworks process does not work? Alternatively, do you foresee something different? Perhaps Professor Weatherill will start off on that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Donald Cameron
In your submission to the committee, you mentioned that the burdens fall on GB goods coming into Northern Ireland. You also say that that will have a knock-on effect for the consumer in Northern Ireland because added costs will add to the price of goods. Are you seeing that on the ground yet? Are those added costs having a practical effect?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Donald Cameron
Yes.
Professor Hunt, I ask you the same question. Also, will you comment on how the Welsh Parliament has dealt with common frameworks in your experience? In the previous session of Parliament, I sat on the Health and Sport Committee and we scrutinised a common framework for food hygiene and labelling. We heard evidence from the Scottish Government and from stakeholders. We were probably the first committee in this Parliament to do that. As a process, it seemed to work relatively well. Do you have any Welsh view, if I can put it like that, of how the process is working?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Donald Cameron
Thank you very much.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Donald Cameron
My question is for Mr Leheny. You commented on the ONS data, published earlier this week, which indicated that Northern Ireland was outperforming the rest of the UK and that that may be down to the benefits under the protocol. Do you agree with that? Does it reflect what you are seeing on the ground or is it simply too early to tell?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Donald Cameron
Do any of the other witnesses want to come in on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Donald Cameron
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. My question is a follow-up to comments that have been made. On Scotland’s relationship with the EU, I think that we all accept that, even after Brexit, the EU will be a focus for Scotland’s international presence. Last week, we heard from the cabinet secretary that the keeping pace power, for example, has not been used and it is not anticipated that it will be used in the near future. Do the witnesses have any observations about the balance that should be struck between our presence in the EU and more widely?
I would like to go to Dr Kirsty Hughes first, because I noted that you commented that it is necessary for us to spread our wings more widely—I hope that I am not mischaracterising what you said. I think that I am right in saying that the two new international offices that the Scottish Government has proposed will be in Warsaw and Copenhagen, which are obviously in the EU. Have we got the balance right in that respect?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Donald Cameron
Thank you for those answers. I will pick up on something that Dr Marks said in his previous comments about how Scottish Government policy interacts with UK Government policy, which is one of the issues at the heart of the inquiry. As we know, international relations is a reserved matter under the Scotland Act 1998, yet we all accept that it is important that Scotland has an international presence. I think that I am right in saying that most of the international offices are located within UK embassies. What is best practice on that? How does Scottish Government policy best interact with UK Government policy when it comes to international relations? What are the pitfalls? What are the flashpoints?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Donald Cameron
I have two questions, but I will be as concise as possible. First, how do we practically measure success? That is one of the hardest things to do in relation to Scotland’s international footprint.
Secondly, are the witnesses satisfied that there is enough co-ordination, particularly on thematic issues, between the various international offices and hubs that exist, including the Scottish Development International offices?