The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 447 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Donald Cameron
I would like to ask about regulatory divergence. I think that we all appreciate that the bill has to be read in conjunction with the Scottish Government’s stated policy of aligning with EU law. Last week, we heard from some witnesses—principally those in the farming, agricultural and fisheries space—that opportunities were potentially presented in the ability to diverge. I have heard very clearly what people have said about wanting to align with environmental law in the EU, but are there any areas in which the witnesses believe that it would be beneficial for Scotland to do its own thing? I have heard people talk about not being resistant to change. Are there any areas in which you think that Scotland could go its own way?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Donald Cameron
I have a specific question for Professor Reid. I was very taken by your description in your evidence. In Scotland, there is some primary legislation that is not caught by the bill, whereas things are caught in England, because they were made under regulation. You have touched on that this morning. You have given the examples of strategic environmental assessments and the water framework directive. Can you think of any other examples in which that strange tension exists?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Donald Cameron
I am sorry, convener—I should have referred to my entry in the register of interests. I am a member of the Faculty of Advocates.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Donald Cameron
To be clear, have you had contact with the Scottish Government?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Donald Cameron
I am grateful for that answer, as one of the criticisms that is made of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 is that it does not allow for regulatory divergence. I am interested in exploring whether there are areas in which divergence from EU law or from UK law could potentially be beneficial for Scotland’s interests.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Donald Cameron
Maurice Golden touched on the difference between burden and standards. Do you have any observation on that from a legal perspective?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Donald Cameron
On practicalities, the committee keeps on hearing evidence about the scale of the task that is before agencies, businesses, sectors and so on. What engagement has the Scottish Government had with you? Is there anything that the Scottish Government could do to help in this endeavour? Has anyone had any interaction with the Scottish Government about that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Donald Cameron
I appreciate that. The bill gives the Scottish Government the ability to restate EU law, as we all know.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Donald Cameron
I will move on to my second point, which is principally directed to Elspeth Macdonald and Jonnie Hall and is about divergence.
Elspeth, today, you spoke about the stakeholders whom you represent and, please correct me if I am wrong, a wish to move away from EU law that enshrines the common fisheries policy. Jonnie, in previous evidence to this committee, you spoke about the common agricultural policy and moving away from that for the needs of Scotland’s farmers and crofters. It is, of course, Scottish Government policy to align with EU law. My question is, looking at the bill, do you have any observations on the policy behind it in relation to allowing your sectors to move away from existing EU law?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Donald Cameron
Thank you, convener. I should refer to my entry regarding agriculture in the register of members’ interests.
I will return to the questions of staff, timing and resources in the third section, and I will ask about two issues. First, on deregulation, the bill gives both the UK Government and the Scottish Government the ability to restate retained EU law and replace it in its entirety. I do not speak for the UK Government, but I think that it is only fair to set out its position on deregulation. It has consistently said that it does not want lower standards and, in some instances, it wants higher standards.
Does the panel accept that, although there is plainly a risk of deregulation, there is equally the potential to either mirror EU standards or enhance protections, which ability applies to the UK Government and, perhaps more pertinently, to the Scottish Government? I pose that question to Julie Hesketh-Laird because she mentioned deregulation.