The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Liam Kerr
Is there a substantive difference in the figures on numbers of sailings and numbers of cancellations or is it not material?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Liam Kerr
I do not doubt that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Liam Kerr
One issue that the committee is looking at is future ferry provision in Scotland. The deputy convener’s question about whether you have any plans to expand your routes was a good one. I might be wrong, but I am not sure that I heard an answer to that. Does Pentland Ferries have any plans to expand on the routes that it currently provides?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Liam Kerr
What about Western Ferries?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Liam Kerr
I understand that answer. Incidentally, I am not quite clear whether the £2.4 million is for publicity and awareness raising as well as for the process. One would have thought that the Scottish Government would be able to project the cost that is associated with the publication of proposals, consultation, the handling of representations, appointing a reporter and a process to hold a hearing. It should be able to come up with at least a ballpark figure for that. Local authorities should also be able to say that, when the measures come in, what the costs would roughly be if they had to run a full process. Am I missing something, minister?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
If only 10 per cent of overflows are monitored, and given that overflows have increased by 70 per cent since 2017, to about 563,000 hours, does that suggest that the problem of sewage overflows is actually far worse than the data currently suggests?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
I will stick to the same topic in my question to John Kerr. In October, The Courier reported that raw sewage had been pumped into Loch Leven. At the time, NatureScot called that a “serious pollution incident”. The report asked the minister for a response, but she appears to have declined. A spokesman talked about historical investment and some general on-going investment. Given that incident, and the statistics that I just put to Jo Green, is it NatureScot’s view that the issue is not being taken seriously enough? Do you think that anything will change?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Forgive me for interrupting. My question might not have translated well. I asked specifically about the 10 per cent of sewage overflows that are monitored, which is markedly less than the proportion being monitored in England. Why is there that disparity? Why are we monitoring only 10 per cent of overflows? Is it your view that we should be monitoring many more?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Very good. Is there an issue with basing those reviews only on publicly available data, given, for example, the lack of sewage overflow data, which we examined earlier?