The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1309 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful to you all.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
The figures before us that project what is coming up in future will have been prepared over a considerable time. However, the Scottish Government is proposing to release up to 1,000 criminals early between now and April. Did the Scottish Government seek advice from the police, based on previous release programmes, on the costs that Police Scotland might incur as a result of any early release? In any event, do you take a view on the Scottish Police Federation’s recently launched “Assault the police? No early release” campaign?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. My first question is to Liliana Torres Jiménez, and I remind colleagues that I am currently regulated by the Law Society of Scotland, of which I am a member.
Liliana, in your submission and opening remarks, you talked about your concerns about the definition of sexual acts and the proposed penalties. Could you expand on your concerns and tell us what needs to be amended to address them?
In your submission, you brought up the policy memorandum, which specifically says that the bill aims to
“reduce the amount of prostitution in Scotland”.
Will the bill, as drafted and/or amended, achieve that?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
You successfully pre-empted where I was going with that question about the contradiction between what Ash Regan told the committee on 25 June about not necessarily needing women’s evidence and your suggestion in your opening submissions. You referenced specifically the situations in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Is the matter of whether people in prostitution need to give evidence the only evidential challenge that has been faced there, or have you seen other evidential challenges that cause you concern?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Yes, it does—thank you. I am going to press you, Dr Forbes, simply because your submission specifically says that the Crown Office is “mindful of the challenges” in enforcing the legislation in Ireland and is
“concerned that ... prosecutors in Scotland will face similar evidential barriers”.
What are those evidential barriers that you might face that would be similar? I am trying to understand that.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
You heard me earlier talk about the capital side of things. The SPA submission says that
“underinvestment in the police estate and technology remains one of the most pressing investment issues for policing”
and that the move to the single force has exacerbated that. The submission suggests that Police Scotland requires an increased capital investment of £93.9 million
“to deliver the basic rolling replacement programme of fleet, systems and policing equipment”,
which does not include some other things that would ideally be done. Again, this begs the question what would not receiving the increased investment mean for that basic programme, and what are the practical implications for policing?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful, convener. Good morning. Chief constable, in your written submission, you set out that, should you not receive the additional £113.4 million funding requested for strengthening the front line, workforce modernisation savings will have to be identified. Can you put numbers on that in terms of officers? What would be the practical implications for policing, should you have to make those savings?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Thank you very much for that. You will probably be asked about how it can be made better going forward.
I will bring in Professor Phoenix by asking a straight question. If this bill comes in and criminalises buyers, what will the impact of that be, based on the evidence that you have seen?
11:45
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I shall.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I will ask two questions and will give each of our witnesses an opportunity to respond, starting with Dr Vuolajärvi. I want to pick up on the point about evidence that you raised during your opening remarks. What does the evidence tell us about the impact of the Nordic model—the criminalisation of the buyer—on the number of people who are involved in prostitution, the experience of those people of safety, stigmatisation and access to support, and the involvement of organised crime, including trafficking, in prostitution?