The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1245 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
Kate Wallace, do you want to add to that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
Kate Wallace, you have cued me up nicely by talking about the victim notification scheme. I recently asked a written question of the Government about the contact centre, the answer to which suggested that money for any developments would need to be found from existing budgets for the sector. In that context, do the changes to the bill that the cabinet secretary is proposing make any difference to the resources that your organisations might need in order to continue to carry out your work effectively? If so, do you get the sense that the cabinet secretary is seeking funding for that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
Forgive me for interrupting, but, just to be absolutely clear, would it be Victim Support Scotland’s position that a case involving a charge of murder should be prosecuted in the sexual offences court and not be retained by the High Court?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
I understand. Kate Wallace, do you have a view on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
For the avoidance of doubt, is there any way that 10 out of 15 could be considered a supermajority?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
Yes. With regard to section 63, on anonymity for victims, the committee raised a couple of issues around the public domain defence and the application of a definition of “victim”. The cabinet secretary’s letter suggests various amendments to address those points. Will they be sufficient, or could they have gone further?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
To be clear, though, you would prefer it if the cabinet secretary’s amendments were to go further, particularly with regard to anonymity after death. Is that right?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Liam Kerr
Good morning. Police Scotland advised the committee that a flat-cash settlement, or a 3 per cent real-terms reduction in funding, would see officer numbers drop to as low as 15,100, or to below 15,000, respectively. It is important to be clear that Deputy Chief Constable Connors followed that up by saying that she did not believe
“that public safety would be compromised”
by such reductions, but that Police Scotland would need
“to prioritise and make more difficult choices around the threat, harm and risk.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 30 October 2024; c 9.]
Does the cabinet secretary accept the projections of those numbers in those financial scenarios? If so, what does the cabinet secretary understand that the police would have to do in terms of prioritisation and making those difficult choices?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Liam Kerr
Yes; I am very grateful. It is very interesting.
My second question might be a little more awkward, but I feel that I need to ask it, to get the issue out in public. Your role is to scrutinise the police, at least in part, or to have oversight of the police. Earlier, you talked about public awareness and public perception. You are joined today by Ross MacDonald, who has joined you on secondment from Police Scotland. Now, there is no question about Mr MacDonald’s expertise; I can see that from the committee papers. However, Mr MacDonald is seconded and is therefore still an office-holder of Police Scotland. Given that the public perception of such a secondment might involve a question about independence, why was that route chosen, and is there merit in future in looking beyond the police and perhaps beyond the public sector?