The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1163 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I have one final question, which is also for ACC Paton. You have talked about the initiatives that are going on and the positive impact that they are having. However, both ASPS and the SPF, in their evidence to the committee, mentioned the right care, right person approach, which is used throughout most of England and Wales, I think—those are my words, not theirs. What is your view on that model, and should it be adopted by Police Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning, everyone. My first question is for Assistant Chief Constable Paton. Police Scotland has a data dashboard that helps to provide an understanding of mental health demand on police time. The cabinet secretary told the committee last year that it would be rolled out to other partners. How is the dashboard performing, what are you doing with the data and has it been rolled out?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
That is obviously important work. You have also set up a mental health task force and a mental health strategic oversight board. His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland has recommended that you produce a mental health strategy and a delivery plan.
However, some evidence that the committee received in advance of today’s meeting suggests that the impressive array of work that is being done at strategic level is not translating into operational delivery for front-line officers. ACC Paton, what is Police Scotland’s view of that assessment? Do you agree with it? What are the potential barriers to the translation to operational delivery?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I will speak quickly, convener. I will put my question to ACC Paton, if I may. Section 297 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 gives the police powers to remove
“a person ... in a public place ... to a place of safety”
if they reasonably believe that there is
“a mental disorder”
and some other conditions apply. The police cannot remove the person from their home, and such removal requires there to be a mental disorder, which police officers are not necessarily trained to assess. I go back to Dr Steel’s point that police officers often respond to mental distress rather than mental disorders. Should the committee consider whether the 2003 act needs to be amended or improved to help you to do your job?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
On that point—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I will be very quick, convener. On that point, ACC Paton, you have talked a lot about the improvements and the good work that is going on, but ASPS and the SPF were very clear that that is not necessarily translating to the front line. If I ask them in a year’s time whether that has improved, will they tell me that there has been a tangible improvement at the operational level?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Liam Kerr
A similar question occurs to me. You said that there was a potential gap; however, earlier in your remarks, you said that it has become apparent that the change is needed. That rather implies that there have been some cases in which the police have been hamstrung or perhaps less able to put together an application. Is that correct? If so, are you aware of any negative consequences of this change not having been in place already, such that it is now needed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Liam Kerr
I understand. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Liam Kerr
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Liam Kerr
It is indeed an unusual approach. You have said that we all want to see progress and that there has been plenty of engagement with victims groups, but last week, Victim Support Scotland told the committee that it was worried that the introduction of a new victim contact team was
“counterintuitive, potentially costly and potentially unnecessary”.—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 4 December 2024; c 24.]
Therefore, there is at least a risk that you might be lodging amendments that do not have the support of victims organisations. We do not even know what this is going to look like. What would be your response if it turned out that victims groups were not supportive of the detail of the amendments?