The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1163 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
Simon Brown, I want to take you back to something that you said earlier, just to ensure that we air this point. You talked about the need for legal aid provision for solicitors when they are dealing with virtual attendance. We already know that, in a context in which there is a significant decline in such solicitors doing legal aid work, many will feel that the provision is less than ideal already. Can you help the committee to understand what legal aid is currently available, if it is available at all for virtual attendance, and what the issues are around legal aid in general?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I would like to press you on the costings. Page 16 of your report details the finances, which are considerable and have increased by £500,000 in the past year. Staffing costs, which are clearly required based on what you have just said, make up 84 per cent of your spend. Can you tell the committee more about that?
I hear what you say about the financial memorandum and the difficulties of accurately making projections, but MSPs will have to consider such issues. What is the financial impact of the bill on the PIRC? The Scottish Government has had difficulty in making accurate projections in financial memoranda, so have the extra costs been sufficiently accounted for to give you comfort, particularly given Phil Chapman’s comments about the changes to corroboration?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand and am grateful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. Michelle Macleod, on exactly that point, one of the first points in the foreword to your report notes that your
“workload has increased substantially over the past decade.”
This afternoon, MSPs will consider the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Bill, in which the PIRC features heavily and which will increase your responsibility. In order to help members with our deliberations, what impact do you project that the bill, if it is passed in its current form, will have on your already increased workload?
10:15Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Liam Kerr
That really will be interesting. However, as colleagues will probably want to ask about the strategic review, I will back down on that, if that is okay.
I have one final question. Your report is very good, and I enjoyed looking through it. However, there is no doubt that what you and your colleagues have just said is concerning, because the Parliament has to be very careful about how it spends money. I did not immediately see, from the report, the horizon scanning on, for example, the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Bill. Why not? That is a genuine question, because it seems to me that any reader would be helped by that.
Is there anything else that we need to be aware of—on legislation, for example—that is not in the report and could impact on your finances?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
You heard me ask about the data dashboard, and I am pleased to say that ACC Paton gave a pretty positive report. We know from one of your earlier letters that it was intended to be rolled out by the end of last year, but I think that I heard earlier that it is not quite there yet. Will the data arising from the data dashboard be shared with the Scottish Government, or is it operational and only for Police Scotland? What is your view on the roll-out if the timescale has not been met?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning to the cabinet secretary and her officials. Cabinet secretary, you will have heard in the previous session—you will no doubt have considered what was said—that ASPS and the SPF have, in their submissions to the committee, highlighted several concerns. One of those is that the police, rather than other organisations, are having to lead on this area.
I give you the opportunity to give your views on that and to say whether you think that there is sufficient input and leadership from other organisations and portfolio areas to address mental health and policing.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
In 2021, the Lord Advocate made a statement on diversion from prosecution. She stated that recorded police warnings could be given for possession of any class of drugs. I appreciate that you might need to come back to me on this, but do you have statistics to hand on how many such warnings for possession were given pre and post that announcement and positioning? Is that broken down for different substances? Crucially for our purposes today, are you aware of any direct impact of that positioning on policing time spent on people experiencing harmful substance abuse?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful for that—thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful—thank you.