Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1245 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Cybercrime

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Liam Kerr

ACC Houston, unlike elsewhere in the UK, the proceeds of crime in Scotland, of which there have been some significant seizures, cannot be used for policing, as I understand it, or, for example, for agencies such as the Cyber and Fraud Centre, Victim Support Scotland, prevention or anything such as that. Do you have any idea why that is the case? I appreciate that Police Scotland is there to keep us safe rather than to make policy—that is our job—but do you take a view on whether the Parliament might look to change that?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Cybercrime

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Liam Kerr

That is fascinating—thank you. As no one else wants to respond, I will hand back to the convener.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Law Enforcement and Judicial Co-operation (European Union)

Meeting date: 30 April 2025

Liam Kerr

I would be grateful for that—thank you.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Law Enforcement and Judicial Co-operation (European Union)

Meeting date: 30 April 2025

Liam Kerr

That is perfectly fair. It is really so that the committee can say to the Scottish Government, “Listen, this is what the experts are saying that you need to address.”

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 30 April 2025

Liam Kerr

I think that that final point was the answer to my question. I am concerned, because the committee has heard from those three separate agencies that they are concerned that the court system will not be ready. However, I think that what I heard in your final sentence was that engagement has been happening and that the information that the committee received is perhaps now out of date. Is that roughly where we are? Will the courts be ready?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 30 April 2025

Liam Kerr

I am absolutely comfortable with the SSI. However, the committee has heard from the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association, the SCTS and the Law Society of Scotland that the courts will not be ready to return to pre-pandemic time limits. Does the Scottish Government accept that? If so, cabinet secretary, how will you support the return to those time limits? Do you think that the courts will be ready by November?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 30 April 2025

Liam Kerr

Thank you.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Law Enforcement and Judicial Co-operation (European Union)

Meeting date: 30 April 2025

Liam Kerr

I understand. Thank you.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Law Enforcement and Judicial Co-operation (European Union)

Meeting date: 30 April 2025

Liam Kerr

I have a quick question for Helena Farrand Carrapico. Your presentation said that we need to

“Develop the necessary technical capabilities with a view to sharing vehicle registration data”

with the EU. That is on slide 5. It went on to state that we need to

“Negotiate access to the ECRIS-TCN system”.

How challenging would it be to develop those technical capabilities, and would it be challenging and/or costly to negotiate access to that system?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Law Enforcement and Judicial Co-operation (European Union)

Meeting date: 30 April 2025

Liam Kerr

That would be fascinating to read.

I put a related point to Gemma Davies. Your report refers to human rights issues. Page 36 indicates that

“For outgoing extradition requests ... The Extradition Act 2003 includes an additional ground for challenging extradition: the possibility of contesting the Scottish Ministers’ decision ... on the basis that it is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This provision, unique to Scotland, does not exist in England and Wales.”

The report goes on to say that the provision adds complexity. Will you help the committee to understand whether it bites? If so, what do you recommend that the committee does? Do we note it but keep it as best practice, or are you recommending that we align with England and Wales on that?