The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1245 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. I will direct my questions precisely, but catch my eye if you want to come in. I will come to Diane Martin first. The committee has received evidence that states that the criminalisation of those who buy sex would put sex workers at greater risk of violence and would not reduce demand for prostitution or reduce trafficking. Do you take a different view? If so, why?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Yes, convener. I am very grateful to all the witnesses.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. Niki Adams, I will come straight back to you. The committee has your evidence that the criminalisation of those who buy sex puts sex workers at greater risk of violence and does not reduce demand for prostitution or reduce trafficking. Panel 1 took a different view and talked about France, specifically, as an exemplar. Your evidence speaks to specific research in France that has a very different, negative take. Can you help the committee understand why there is a discrepancy on that point? Why is one panel of witnesses telling us that France is an exemplar, while you seem to be saying that it is not, and you conclude that criminalisation will not work?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful for that evidence.
I put a similar question to Laura Baillie. You also raise the subject of safety in your evidence, although your evidence says that criminalisation would mean that sex workers
“would be less able to screen potential clients”
and less able to get a deposit. You refer to an app that enables some form of screening.
The witnesses on panel 1 gave a different response to that—they seemed to suggest that screening and checking is not currently happening in practice. That is clearly different from what you say in your evidence. Can you help the committee to understand why there is that difference and tell us, in your view, what is actually happening on the ground?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I will ask one tiny question on something that you just said, Lynsey Walton. You talked about millions of alerts going out to users. Given what we heard, how much power does the sex worker have to decline the transaction or instruction once they receive that alert?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful for your answer.
09:45Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I put the same question to Bronagh Andrew. According to the bill’s policy memorandum, the measures are intended to “reduce the number” of people in prostitution. Is there any evidence that models such as the Nordic model achieve a reduction in the number of people in prostitution?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Yes, and I want to take that forward. If you do not mind, I will stay with you for this question. You talked about the work that you have been doing jointly with Police Scotland. Last week, I read a report in the Daily Record that said that Police Scotland is supportive of criminalising the purchase of sex but “could not afford to enforce a crackdown”. Given that, to what extent does the effectiveness of a Nordic model hinge on enforcement by the police and courts, or is it more about messaging and driving a culture change?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful. Lynsey, you heard Laura Baillie talking about the Irish experience. Your written evidence also refers to Ireland. You said that, in Northern Ireland, the Department of Justice found “no evidence” of
“a downward pressure on ... demand ... or supply”.
You also refer to a minister in the Republic of Ireland saying that “demand has not decreased.”
Towards the end of the evidence session, the first panel said that the bill is the only legislation that reduces prostitution. You cited the example of Ireland. What, if anything has happened to supply, not just the demand side? You said that only 15 men were convicted in seven years in the Republic, so is it actually a policing issue?
11:30Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Liam Kerr
I will move on, but before I do so, I would just remark—because I think that we would all accept that there is overcrowding—that I was simply trying to establish what is being done to bring that overcrowding down. I certainly do not question the engagement that the cabinet secretary is having, but I think that people outside need to see real change.