The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 979 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Colin Smyth
I wish to follow up on some of the points that have been raised. Local authorities have mentioned
“the challenges in monitoring and capturing this data in respect of sub-contractors and the wider supply chain”
once a contract has begun. They pointed out that,
“At contract evaluation stage, the evaluation panel will consider Fair Work First responses submitted by the principal contractor”,
but the council does not have the resources to follow that up through monitoring what actually happens with subcontractors.
I will start with you, Rob and Joe, as you spoke a wee bit about some relevant discussions. How do you monitor the delivery of fair work principles when you have a big capital project that might have gone to a contractor and that could be subcontracted in a whole range of ways? How do you know that the subcontractors are delivering on those principles?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Colin Smyth
Gordon, feel free to comment on how you monitor what happens beyond the main contractor. It is no secret that the NHS is facing huge financial challenges—my local health board has just announced that it has a £35 million deficit this year alone—and procurement must be one of the ways in which you are seeking to find savings in the health service. At the end of the day, price must be the absolute driver when it comes to delivery. To what extent are you using procurement to try to make the significant savings that you are having to make? What effect does that have on other issues such as fair work and the environment?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Colin Smyth
I turn to Gordon Beattie. The fact that there is a mixed bag in the NHS probably comes down to monitoring as much as anything else. People do not always measure the full range of fair trade goods that they buy. Is that a challenge for the health service? Are you even asked to do that at the moment?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
David Livey is nodding. Is there anything else that we can change in the process to better embed fair work?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
Yes. Are they put off by the requirements? We want to embed fair work across the board, so we must break down the barriers.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
The definition is a clear barrier to achieving that but are there any other barriers? Is there an awareness barrier, with public sector bodies not realising that the local authority or the Scottish Government supports fair trade? Is there a barrier when those who carry out the procurement work simply do not think about fair trade when they are pursuing particular contracts?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
I would like to follow up on the point about fair work. To what extent have the 2014 act and the changes to the procurement process helped to embed fair work? We have talked about the fact that the main barrier is the absence of multiyear funding, but to what extent has the 2014 act embedded fair work in the practices not only of the awarding authorities but of the organisations that bid for contracts? I take on board the issue of multiyear funding, but what else can we do within the process to expand the adoption of fair work?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
You have all talked about the fact that there are many organisations that are not even involved in public procurement because of the barriers. Is fair work a barrier to some of those organisations?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
That is helpful.
10:30Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
My colleague has some questions on gender inequality so you are not getting off lightly, but I want to pursue the points around fair trade. Although it is not a declarable interest, I want to put on the record that I am the convener of the cross-party group on fair trade and I also chair the Dumfries and Galloway fair trade steering group.
I almost feel a wee bit under pressure to answer Martin Rhodes’s question about how we pursue that definition. Just on that point, Martin, is guidance enough or do we need to underpin that definition legally through legislation to make sure it does translate into practice across public procurement?