The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1015 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Smyth
I will bring in the deputy convener at this point.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Smyth
Our next item of business is an evidence session on regional inequalities and productivity. This morning’s evidence session is part of the committee’s on-going consideration of the Scottish Government’s national strategy for economic transformation, of which productivity is a key element.
I am delighted to welcome our panel of witnesses: David Phillips, associate director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies; Simon Pittaway, senior economist at the Resolution Foundation; and Professor Bridgette Wessels, professor in the sociology of inequalities at the Productivity Institute. Thank you so much for joining us this morning. As always, I make an appeal to members and witnesses to keep questions and answers as concise as possible.
I will kick off with the first question. Regional inequalities in earnings, productivity and performance across Scotland are very well documented. I am based down in Dumfries and Galloway, where we usually have the lowest wages and earnings in Scotland. There is a substantial difference in earnings between the centre of Edinburgh and rural communities in Dumfries and Galloway. I am keen to kick off the evidence session by asking the witnesses for their views on what drives regional inequality across Scotland and on how sectors compare in different parts of the country.
That is a nice, straightforward question to kick off with. I do not know who wishes to go first, but the first person I can see is Professor Wessels on my screen, so we will kick off with you, professor.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Smyth
Thank you for that, David, and thank you to all the panel members. That brings us to the end of the evidence session. I appreciate that we have probably kept you for longer than we promised when we asked you to join us, but that is because your insights have been incredibly helpful.
11:27 Meeting continued in private until 11:37.Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Smyth
That is an interesting point about how average earnings do not always reflect the lowest earnings or those at the top.
Our final witness is Simon Pittaway. I put the same question to you, Simon.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Smyth
Thank you. Lorna Slater has a follow-up question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Smyth
You can have one more question, Stephen.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Smyth
You have summed it up well, Stephen: you have said enough. [Laughter.] Thank you for your contribution.
Minister, I have one final question. We have touched on the issue already. Ineos told us that to avoid the loss of the refinery at Grangemouth, the UK and Scottish Governments should have acted five years ago. It was clear from the committee’s report on our just transition for the Grangemouth area inquiry that neither Government had a plan in place for Grangemouth, despite the clear warnings. What lessons is the new Government learning from those mistakes?
Industrial sites across the country will need to go through a transition period. There is work at pace at the moment in Grangemouth—that did not happen early enough. What specific policy lessons is the new Government learning to make sure that those mistakes are not repeated at other sites across the country?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Smyth
Our next item of business is an evidence session on Grangemouth’s industrial future. In November 2023, it was publicly confirmed that the refinery would transition to being a finished fuels import terminal and distribution hub; in September 2024, it was announced that the transition would take place during the second quarter of 2025. Refining at the site has now ceased. The findings of a feasibility study into options for Grangemouth’s industrial future, known as project willow, were published in March.
I am delighted to welcome our witnesses: Michael Shanks MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Energy; and Camilla Pierry, deputy director for energy security at the United Kingdom Government. I thank them for joining us.
As always, I appeal to members to keep their questions as short as possible and also ask for answers to be as concise as possible.
I invite the minister to make a short opening statement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Smyth
I ask the minister to answer the question first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Smyth
That brings us to the end of our evidence session. I thank the minister and Ms Pierry for joining us today—I appreciate that we have kept you longer than we promised to, but your contributions in response to the questions have been very helpful to the work of the committee.
10:08 Meeting continued in private until 10:42.