The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 979 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Colin Smyth
I do not want to put words into anyone’s mouth, but is the solution, therefore, not so much engaging on the initiatives as engaging with the organisations? In that way, when they come to develop levelling up fund bids or growth deals, they will know what you want before they get to that point. They do not have to consult on every single bid—it is about consulting before they get to that point, and that is what helps to drive things forward. Is that the case?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Colin Smyth
When I was the chair of an economy committee on a council it was the usual people who came to all our consultation meetings and it was difficult to reach the thousands of other businesses out there. There is a challenge in trying to reach the organisations that are making some of the decisions.
Carolyn Currie, do you want to come in?
09:45Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Colin Smyth
That brings us to the end of the public evidence session. I thank the witnesses for joining us and contributing today. We kept you a wee bit longer than we promised, but that was because a lot of good points were being made, so thank you.
10:17 Meeting continued in private until 11:59.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
That was going to be my next question, cabinet secretary, but I will refrain from asking it. However, I will definitely pick it up with you after the meeting.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
“Voting member” may be the wrong phrase—I do not know how many times things go to a vote—but, as an organisation, you are a voting member on all four boards. Is that the case?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
I will come to SOSE in a second, but the south of Scotland deal was signed before SOSE existed. Why was Scottish Enterprise not involved in the board, before then passing on to SOSE when it was established?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
Jamie Halcro Johnston has a supplementary question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
Has the role of Scottish Enterprise in growth deals changed? Matt Lockley, you seemed to suggest that Scottish Enterprise did not necessarily support particular economic growth priorities of local authorities, as you have a separate remit from them. Has your involvement in growth deals changed that at all? Are you more involved in projects that the agency would not necessarily have been involved in previously?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
Did they not exist through the economic partnerships?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
To follow up Kevin Stewart’s line of questioning, I will take us back the issue of the cluttered landscape. We are beginning to hear from our evidence that there is a desire to go beyond growth deals 1 and look at growth deals 2 and the future of the structures that have been developed as part of growth deals. Do you have a view on that?
I have heard a couple of people touch on how engagement is also through regional economic partnerships. Do we need to continue the growth deal structures or should that work sit with regional economic partnerships? I do not know whether you have a view on that, and maybe it is unfair to ask you but, given that in some cases you are involved in the growth deals and that in all cases you sit on regional economic partnerships, do you think that we need both? I see everybody putting their heads down and running for cover. Does anybody want to answer that question?