The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 979 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
I will stick with that topic—it is interesting—but I will take a slightly different approach. You mentioned the number of elected representatives, cabinet secretary. The only area where representation is perhaps more cluttered is economic development. You talked about beefing up economic regional partnerships, you listed enterprise bodies such as the SNIB and the UK National Wealth Fund, and you mentioned possible investment zones, green ports and so on. Has consideration been given to using the forums that are in place—economic regional partnerships, for example—rather than replicating growth deal structures, or do you still think that both are relevant?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
I am conscious of time, so I will bring in Lorna Slater.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
Has there been no feedback to Government from deals expressing concerns over the length of time for final assessments?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
I will start with a question to seek clarity in relation to not-for-profit advisers. We have clarified that the act allows not-for-profit advisers to search either of the registers without incurring a fee, but your letter of 31 January—which was very comprehensive, and we thank you for it—indicates that you will not define what not-for-profit advisers are, because you do not believe that many of them will seek to search the registers and that if they do, you would come up with a definition at that point.
If you do not have a definition, how will you decide if an organisation is not-for-profit, what will the criteria be, and how will such organisations be aware that they can search the registers without a fee? If you do not have a definition, how will you decide whether you need a definition due to the number of such organisations coming forward to search the registers?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
The final question is from Daniel Johnson.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
A report of the committee’s consideration of both draft instruments will be prepared and published. I invite members to delegate responsibility to me, as convener, to agree the committee’s report.
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
Our next item is consideration of two negative SSIs, the Movable Transactions (Forms) (Scotland) Regulations 2024 and the Movable Transactions (Register of Assignations and Register of Statutory Pledges Rules) (Scotland) Regulations 2024. The committee is invited to note both instruments. Are members happy to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the fifth meeting in 2025 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee.
Our first item of business is the final evidence-taking session in our inquiry into city region and regional growth deals. I am pleased to welcome this morning’s panel. Kate Forbes, Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic is joined by Scottish Government officials Kate Bryson, head of east and west of Scotland growth deals; Kimberley Daly, head of Highlands, islands, Edinburgh and south of Scotland growth deals; and Anne-Marie Martin, deputy director for regional economic development.
As always, I ask members and witnesses to keep questions and answers as concise as possible. I invite the Deputy First Minister to make a short opening statement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
I appreciate your explanation on the Glasgow deal.
You reject the evidence from groups that the process seems to have slowed compared with early deals. Cabinet secretary, what is your response to the evidence that we have had that the process is far too lengthy and is holding up deals? I will give an example. The Borderlands inclusive growth deal was signed off by the Government and the business case was approved in early 2023. One particular project has been sitting with the Scottish Government. For the past 18 months, it has been going back and forth, with lots of queries on it. That project is now delayed, and there are issues around rising costs and about various other things.
We are getting feedback that the process is very lengthy and is holding up projects.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Colin Smyth
The detailed business case was submitted in August 2023. How lengthy is the assessment process, from the signing off of the business case to the final agreement from the Scottish Government? I have read somewhere that it takes 12 weeks, but that one seems to have taken quite a few months.