The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1099 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Rona Mackay
Good morning, minister. This morning’s session has been very reassuring on a number of counts. We have heard from witnesses who do not want to think that the service is being rushed through without their having a chance to be listened to or to be part of the co-design. From what you have said to my colleague Russell Findlay about the timescale, you are giving that time.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Rona Mackay
There are two aspects to the bill. If we leave aside the constitutional question, the first issue is that the bill is, I believe, a very bad one. It shuts the door on justice for people who are looking for justice for what happened decades ago in Northern Ireland. The bill is in no one’s interest—its premise is very bad.
Constitutionally, it is a no-brainer. For example, the response from the Lord Advocate states:
“The Bill, in its current form, engages a number of areas over which I have constitutional responsibility and does so in a manner novel to Scots criminal law.”
Therefore, the bill would represent new ground and not good new ground, so I strongly recommend that we do not consent to the LCM.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Rona Mackay
That is very reassuring.
We have also heard from witnesses that the status quo is not an option. Pretty much across the board, people realise that they want something to be done. I am very reassured that you have been listening to people with lived experience, and I am sure that other stakeholders will be similarly reassured.
Are you confident that, if local authorities put pressure on you not to include justice social work in the bill and that pressure is mainly based on local authorities’ financial fears, you can answer those concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
The success rate in prevention of reoffending seems to be good.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
If multiple agencies were inputting information, would there be implications for how long it would take to get a decision made?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
Just to clarify, are you suggesting that the first step in the application would be to contact a third sector organisation that has been working with the person?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
Tracey, may I have your views?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
Is there a risk that some people might fall through the net if they are not connected to a third sector organisation and are not getting support?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
Very briefly—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
Good morning. From your submissions, you seem to be broadly supportive of the bill, although you highlight resources as an issue.
I want to ask a wee bit more about the suggestion that third sector organisations, when working with individuals in a case, should be able to provide input to help to inform decisions. How would that work in practice? Are there concerns in general about how that might delay the process? What are the timings likely to be in the whole court system, if several organisations are inputting and may be working to different timescales? Has the system suffered because of a lack of information from third sector organisations until now? I think that you believe that the bill should provide the opportunity for third sector organisations to do that, so I ask you to talk a wee bit about that.
I will go to Charlie Martin first.