The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1122 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
The bill could stipulate that there would be no comment to the media about why a member is not attending the Parliament. It could stipulate that that information is not for public consumption.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
That is a really useful explanation. I did not realise that that was the case.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
There should be an element of sensitivity in the bill, if you like, to stipulate confidentiality. I imagine that the bill could include that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Okay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Salary limitations are a key element, certainly in the minds of the public—it is their money that we are spending. Most respondents to the committee have stated that, in the case of MSP-MP dual mandates, the elected representative should be allowed to receive only a single salary. Some have suggested the retention of the higher of the two salaries and some have suggested that the original salary should be ceased upon election to the Scottish Parliament. Is the Government forming an opinion on that? Should we keep it simple so that, as soon as you are elected to a different institution, the previous salary stops?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Good afternoon. I have some general questions, because this is not something that I have focused on much over the years. It seems from our notes that there have been a large number of objections. Is that normal when you start the process of changing boundaries, and are those objections usually from local authorities? What is the proportion of individual residents who would normally object?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
The local authorities that responded were presumably worried about council tax consequences and what they would bring in and win or lose because of boundary changes—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
No?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Rona Mackay
That is interesting. The chart that we have shows that quite a number of local authorities objected. I am wondering why, if the process does not affect them.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I thank Maggie Chapman for lodging amendment 54. I completely agree with everything that she said, and it is good that the issue has been raised. My only concern is that the bill before us might not be the correct bill for her proposed new section—it should perhaps go in the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill; maybe the cabinet secretary will address that. Nevertheless, I completely understand and agree with Maggie Chapman’s argument.