Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 4 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1122 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

The bill could stipulate that there would be no comment to the media about why a member is not attending the Parliament. It could stipulate that that information is not for public consumption.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Dual Mandates

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

That is a really useful explanation. I did not realise that that was the case.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

There should be an element of sensitivity in the bill, if you like, to stipulate confidentiality. I imagine that the bill could include that.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

Okay.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Dual Mandates

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

Salary limitations are a key element, certainly in the minds of the public—it is their money that we are spending. Most respondents to the committee have stated that, in the case of MSP-MP dual mandates, the elected representative should be allowed to receive only a single salary. Some have suggested the retention of the higher of the two salaries and some have suggested that the original salary should be ceased upon election to the Scottish Parliament. Is the Government forming an opinion on that? Should we keep it simple so that, as soon as you are elected to a different institution, the previous salary stops?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

Good afternoon. I have some general questions, because this is not something that I have focused on much over the years. It seems from our notes that there have been a large number of objections. Is that normal when you start the process of changing boundaries, and are those objections usually from local authorities? What is the proportion of individual residents who would normally object?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

The local authorities that responded were presumably worried about council tax consequences and what they would bring in and win or lose because of boundary changes—

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

No?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Rona Mackay

That is interesting. The chart that we have shows that quite a number of local authorities objected. I am wondering why, if the process does not affect them.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 June 2025

Rona Mackay

I thank Maggie Chapman for lodging amendment 54. I completely agree with everything that she said, and it is good that the issue has been raised. My only concern is that the bill before us might not be the correct bill for her proposed new section—it should perhaps go in the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill; maybe the cabinet secretary will address that. Nevertheless, I completely understand and agree with Maggie Chapman’s argument.