The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 967 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
Going back to the issue of women in custody, which is an area on which I am particularly focused, I have what I know is a very broad question for Suzanne, Sharon and Keith. Nevertheless, I am interested in hearing their responses to it.
Do you think that the bill will bring about the necessary changes? As has been said, most women who are on remand or in custody should not be anywhere near prison, and it would be a fantastic outcome if the bill were to facilitate keeping them out of it. Do you think that there is a possibility, albeit with the necessary resources and interagency management, of the bill helping to keep women out of custody or remand?
Suzanne, could you answer that first, please?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Rona Mackay
That is really helpful. Lynne, would you like to provide some input?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rona Mackay
I take a more straightforward view: I completely and utterly oppose the bill. There are two sides to it. There is the mission creep into our competencies and judicial system, which is quite blatant. The other side is the content of the bill. I really do not understand why the UK Government is trying to introduce this. I am not sure what its objective is. In relation to the commission, people say that it is good to investigate things, but if you look at the detail, you see that, even if it investigates, nothing can happen. There is a block on any access to justice for victims.
I cannot see any good in the bill. I realise that I might be outvoted, but I do not think that there is any purpose in delaying our decision. There should be a flat rejection of the bill. I am not sure of the worth of getting further information, because the bill, as it stands, is clear cut. I would oppose it completely right now.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rona Mackay
I broadly agree with what Jamie Greene has said. The response to our letter was a wee bit defensive. It did not show much in the way of actual understanding of the issues that we presented, even in the case of the part in the notes about the employee assistance line. Somebody called it and was told to phone back later, but when he phoned back, he was told that they could not help him because he did not meet the specific criteria.
David Page described the trauma risk management model as a proactive model of support that officers and staff are expected to access by self-referral. We heard that that was not working, but he has not really addressed that in his responses. Those are just a couple of examples. We need to dig deeper. I agree with Jamie Greene: we need some recognition that there are problems and that we need to fix them. We have not really had that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Rona Mackay
Thank you. I know that my colleagues will have further questions on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Rona Mackay
I am just struggling to understand why it would be in the Government’s interests to do its own thing and not listen to you. I do not think that that is what is intended. It does not make sense that the Government would not take into account what you are saying. I come back to the issue of timing, which is something that we cannot really do anything about just now.
Anyway, thank you. You have made good points.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Rona Mackay
For what it is worth, I think that your idea of holding workshops is a good one.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Rona Mackay
Great. That is good to know.
I have one more question, and I suspect that my colleagues will have further questions in the same area. I understand that the replacements for HMP Greenock and HMP Dumfries are not currently a priority in the capital budget. Will they be added anytime soon? I know that that is like asking, “How long is a piece of string?”, but are they still in the pipeline?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Rona Mackay
Good morning. His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Prisons for Scotland, Wendy Sinclair-Gieben, told us that she thought there could be a time slip on delivery of the HMP Glasgow project because of budget restraints. Will you comment on that? Would the gap be filled, and do you have guarantees that the new prison will be ready for 2026?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Rona Mackay
My question relates to the courts and prosecution services. Before I ask it, I note that it is interesting and important that Conservative committee members have been asking overtly political questions—and, when the cabinet secretary responds with straightforward and honest answers, they do not like it.
Cabinet secretary, I will be interested to know about something that you touched on in your opening statement: the priority for funding to be given to Lady Dorrian’s review, the prosecution of rape and sex offences, and the work of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service Covid unit. I turn first to Lady Dorrian’s review. Will budgetary implications affect that?