The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Rona Mackay
I agree 100 per cent with Pauline McNeill’s comments. The situation is on-going: St Mary’s Kenmure in my constituency paused admissions, which caused a shortage of beds. That pause has been lifted, but there are still fewer beds than there were before. I see that Rossie up north has four new beds, but do they offset the ones that St Mary’s has lost? There is an issue with capacity.
I am keen to ask for an update on the reform of the contractual model for the provision and financing of secure places. The Justice Committee tackled that question in the previous parliamentary session, and we are not in a different situation now. We should ask for an update on that model, although one may be coming.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
That is interesting. I will leave that to my colleagues.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
I presume that local authorities would be heavily involved in that side of it. They would make signing places available and guide people to them.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
As no one else wants to comment on that aspect, I will move on to my next question. Does the timeframe that is proposed in the bill between the date on which a petition officer receives the recall notice and the date on which those who are eligible can start signing the petition seem straightforward to you?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
What are your views on signing by proxy versus signing in person? Is proxy signing generally acceptable? Given the nature of a recall petition, it is different from a normal election. Should people have to sign in person?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
Are the proposed rules on people who wish to sign by post clear? More widely, are the rules clear enough for people to understand? At first glance, they seem quite complicated. Could they be simplified to help the members of the public concerned to understand them?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
Good morning. I want to ask you a question about the regional recalls process. What is your view on the additional requirement that the threshold would need to be met in at least three constituencies, and what sort of practical implications would that have?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
We need clarification of all of that. I am also interested to know how the figure of three was reached. I know that you will not know that, but perhaps the member can enlighten us later.
You have outlined some of the practical considerations that might arise, which was interesting. Jenny Brotchie, I do not think that that is an area for youm but I do not want to leave you out.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
In general, as you read the bill, do you see anything and think, “Oh, that could be difficult for us to manage?”
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Rona Mackay
Absolutely—I was coming to that. With respect, you guys deal with the process, so you know about it, but it is different for the public. I would assume that, if the bill is passed, there would be a straightforward public awareness exercise so that people will know exactly what the situation is.
I come to my last question. Is anything in the bill a red flag to you? Do you see anything that you think should not be there or that will be problematic? Does anything stand out to you at the minute?