The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1295 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Thank you. Rob Holland, can you do any planning for the days in November and other days when you know there will be a lot of fireworks? Will the control zones have an effect?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Animals do not enjoy fireworks—I think that that is a given—so would your organisation have preferred an outright ban on fireworks?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Is there not a danger that control zones might move the problem elsewhere? If people in a certain community are in a zone where they cannot use fireworks, would they just go somewhere else? That is a hypothetical question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Rona Mackay
I will move on to David Hamilton. You should feel free to answer those questions, but I have a specific question for you.
Do you have any concerns about how the proposed licensing scheme will be policed? Will it create a big challenge for you? Have you had discussions with the Scottish Government about the bill? I am not sure whether the onus will fall on local authorities or the police, but I guess that dealing with someone who does not have a licence would fall to the police.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Rona Mackay
That is a good point.
This might seem a bit basic, but I would like to ask about the practicalities of the scheme. Do you envisage your officers going up to someone who is having a fireworks display in a small village or wherever and asking to see their licence? How will you know whether someone has a licence?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Thank you. That is interesting.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Rona Mackay
I think that colleagues will ask questions about that issue later.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
My arithmetic is not great but, of the further 10 cases,
“2 have proceeded, one was deserted and 3 were converted to a physical trial.”
That leaves four. What happened to them?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
That would be useful—thank you.
I have just one more question; I know that other members have questions. It is about remote attendance by vulnerable witnesses in criminal cases. How does the system that is used now compare with what happened before the pandemic? We heard from Victim Support Scotland and Women’s Aid that witnesses find remote attendance a lot less intimidating, because it means that there is no face-to-face contact with alleged perpetrators, and that they are very much in favour of it. What are your thoughts on how the process has changed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Good morning. Cabinet secretary, you will be aware that we have heard support for, and concerns about, the greater use of virtual options—there are mixed views on the subject. Some of those concerns are around the fact that it can prevent effective communication between legal representatives and their clients, impede the assessment of the credibility of witnesses and discriminate against people who do not have access to digital technology. What are your thoughts on that? Are those concerns being addressed?