The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1761 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
Last week, a group of GPs in my constituency asked me a question that I was not able to answer. They asked whether there would be a duty for someone expressing that conscientious objection to refer a person requesting assisted dying to another assessor. Can you give me a definitive answer?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
We will come to questions on that later. If we do not cover that, I will be happy to come back to you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
Good morning, and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2025 of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee.
The first item on our agenda today is to take evidence as part of the committee’s scrutiny of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill at stage 1 from the member in charge of the bill, Liam McArthur MSP. I welcome Liam McArthur, who is joined by Claudia Bennett, a senior solicitor in legal services at the Scottish Parliament; Nick Hawthorne, who is a senior clerk in the non-Government bills unit of the Scottish Parliament; and Dr Amanda Ward, who is adviser to Liam McArthur.
Before we move to questions, I invite Mr McArthur to make a brief opening statement.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
Okay, but the financial memorandum did not include any other profession that might be involved in the care of someone who was accessing assisted dying.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
The status of assisted dying as a reasonable treatment option in Scotland is unclear and there have been calls for that to be addressed directly in the bill. If assisted dying is considered to be a reasonable treatment option, doctors would have a duty to discuss it with patients in appropriate situations, regardless of any conscientious objection to the practice that they might have. How do you respond to that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
Do you think that the bill needs tightening up to define what the phrase means, to address the concerns that were raised at that evidence session about people travelling to Scotland and setting up a temporary address here in order to access assisted dying?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
We will move straight to questions, beginning with Emma Harper.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
The bill would require someone to be “ordinarily resident” in Scotland for 12 months before they would be eligible for assisted dying. Last week, in giving evidence, Police Scotland raised questions about what is meant by the term “ordinarily resident”. I am keen to explore why that term was used and what “ordinarily resident” means in the bill.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
In view of the letter from the finance committee and its determinations, what the Scottish Government has put on record and the omissions that you have alluded to today in relation to your financial memorandum, will you be looking to review your financial memorandum?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Clare Haughey
Several respondents to the consultation on the bill noted that there is no provision for challenging or reviewing decisions that are made by doctors on whether someone’s illness meets the definition in the bill of terminal illness, whether they have capacity to make the decision or whether they have been coerced. The Edinburgh Napier University centre for mental health practice, policy and law research submitted that it was
“concerned at the lack of any accessible mechanism by which the decision of a doctor can be appealed or independently reviewed by the courts.”
Again, is that something that you considered? Now that the bill has been under some scrutiny, would you consider amending it in that regard?