The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1739 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Clare Haughey
We might move on to that, but we are straying from what I asked about.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Clare Haughey
It was at the lower level that the scrutiny should have taken place, but it does not sound as if it did. My apologies for not using the correct parlance for universities.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Evidently, it was not.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
I have a point of clarification for Hilary Steele on the McCulloch case, which she mentioned. I am also aware of the Montgomery case. Is there potential that the bill as drafted, if it became law, could run counter to those judgments, given that it specifies that certain treatment options must be offered?
10:15Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Before we move on, I declare an interest: I hold a bank nurse contract with NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
I have a short, sharp question about the clinicians who are involved in making those treatment determinations. My assumption, which is based on the bill and on listening to the previous witness panel, was that the clinicians would be NHS employees. However, if we look at who can actually make a determination, the list includes doctors, who may not be employed by the health service, and pharmacist prescribers, many of whom work in community pharmacies and are therefore contracted to the NHS for some, but not all, services. What is your opinion on that cohort of healthcare professionals, including advanced nurse prescribers, being determined in law as being able to make treatment determinations?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
I do not want to take up an inordinate amount of time because I know that there are lots of questions, but there seems to be a working assumption, given the cohort of staff defined in the bill, that NHS staff will be making the treatment determinations. However, as I said, some of those healthcare professionals do not work for the NHS. For example, we have GPs and pharmacists who are independent contractors. Does that cause you any concern?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
That is fine; thank you.
We move to questions from Elena Whitham.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Brian Whittle has a brief supplementary.