The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 950 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
Which stakeholders would Mr Greer envisage that we should stipulate? I hear him saying that we should not stipulate, but there are many broader stakeholders in Scottish education. I do not want to close the door to that wider engagement, but we need to be careful that we are not being overly specific about some of this.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
I will bring in Jaxon on that point.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
The member makes a fair point, so we will take that away and reflect on how we could strengthen the approach, although I would be worried about specifying. We will look again at how we can strengthen some of the wording around our expectations on consultation so that it is meaningful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
Part of that is for the Government, but it is partly about co-creation, too. The approach that we are taking is not about the Government dictating things, but about our stakeholders saying, “This is how ambitious we want to be, and this is where we want to go.” There was a lot of support for the charters in the consultation, particularly around the role of children and young people, but some concerns were raised about their potentially becoming a token gesture, and we might come on to talk about that.
We must have better transparency; that is the real purpose of the charters, and it is something that has probably been a challenge for the organisation in recent history. Therefore, the charters have to be co-designed with the groups whom they are intended to serve, and I think that that will answer the call for ambition, as all user groups need to be content with the co-design approach. It is not me, as cabinet secretary, who will decide the level of ambition—I think that that would be quite wrong. Instead, it is for those groups to come together and set their own aspirations. I imagine that they will be very ambitious, and we will have to respond to that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
No, not necessarily. I go back to the point that I made to the member at the start of this evidence session: if there are specific parts of the bill that the member thinks are deficient in some way, I am happy to work with her on looking at how we can strengthen them.
I have to come back to my original point, though, which is that the status quo is not working. We have to get this right. We have to reform the qualifications body, because I cannot deliver on the aspirations of Professor Hayward’s review unless we do this work. The body has to listen to the views of teachers and young people. It has not been able to fulfil those expectations in recent history, so how we reform and change it is really important.
Look, I am a politician, and I am quite sure that we will all disagree on parts of the bill, but there will also be areas on which we can make progress. However, if the member thinks that this area needs strengthening, I will be happy to hear any of her views further to that.
10:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
The member makes what sounds like a reasonable point. Again, I will defer to my officials.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
The solution to that, as proposed in the Muir report, is the shared inspection framework, which has been developed with HMI and the Care Inspectorate. Ms Don-Innes and I met HMI and the Care Inspectorate recently to discuss that, and that work is being taken forward.
You make an important point, convener. We are not doubling the workload here; instead, this is a shared approach to the inspection of early learning and childcare, which is unlike other parts of our education system. That is exactly why the Care Inspectorate sits alongside HMI in that respect. That work is being taken forward, and I am happy to write to the committee with further detail if that would be helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
I will bring in Clare Hicks on the practicalities of the advisory council and then come in to talk about how I envisage it driving improvement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Jenny Gilruth
I just want to check, Mr Kerr, whether you are referring to the remainder of Education Scotland.