The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1144 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
They were rejected for a variety of reasons—not necessarily because of the process, but they did not even get through it.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
I would need to write to the committee on the specifics.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Bodies would have had to come through the process, and only one has to date.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
A lot of the situation has grown up historically and things have been put in place over a long period of time. Some of the bodies predate the creation of the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament by some way. The decision on where an individual body should sit is taken case by case, depending on the nature of what the body has been asked to do. There are examples of bodies that have been moved from one classification to another over time.
On the final part of your question, I think that classifications are reviewed on an on-going basis in an ad hoc sense. On whether there is a need for a more structured review, I note that I would not be opposed to doing that, just to ensure that we have everything in the right place.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Absolutely. The category that they are in could have implications for their ability to operate. For example, a body’s Office for National Statistics classification can affect its funding, revenue generation opportunities and other aspects. That can change over time, of course. In general, however, on the question whether there is scope for a review to ensure that everything is in the right place, we would be open to that.
10:15SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
It may depend on the classification, but I shall defer to my officials, who may have the answer.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
In the Government, the accountable officers have responsibility for that. There will be people looking at the budget lines; there is a director general who acts as accountable officer, and there is the principal accounting officer, who is the permanent secretary. Such issues would be dealt with in the same way as any other expenditure within the civil service would be dealt with.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
We are looking more generally at information-gathering requirements and the onerousness of the requirements on public bodies. If audit fell within that, we would consider it. We are open to considering any specific examples of what to include in the work that you want to point us toward.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Absolutely.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
I do not think that, and I do not think that anybody would think that; maybe they do, but they should not, because, as I said earlier, a commission is another voice in the business of drawing attention to issues that need to be addressed. If anybody thinks that, the strategy is not very effective.