The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Ivan McKee
And that would be in the public domain.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Moving on to other subjects, there is provision in the proposed bill for a new Scottish disqualification order. Perhaps I could start by getting your perspective on whether intimidation or abuse of electoral workers in Scotland is, of itself, a problem that needs to be addressed.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Ivan McKee
I have a final question. Again, I do not expect you to take a policy position on this, but are there any practical considerations around disqualification of candidates for MSP or councillor roles who appear on the sex offenders register? Would you like to make any comments on that issue?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Would Andy Hunter or Robert Nicol like to comment on any of those issues?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Are there any practical considerations? You have already mentioned that disqualification needs to be declared up front. Other members of the panel should feel free to comment, if they have any perspective on that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Ivan McKee
It is clear that there are many situations in which someone could be elected to serve a term of office and then not complete that term, and that some of those situations might be known to the person at the start of the term and others might not be known to them until later, during the term itself.
You mentioned that the public might expect to have the right, if they elect someone, to expect that person, at least at the outset, to intend to serve the full term. Is there, or could there be, provision under the proposals for such candidates to make their situation known in the public domain, so that the public would vote in the full knowledge that there is the potential risk that the person may not be able to serve the full term?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Do you have any perspective on whether a disqualification order would be likely to act as a deterrent to unacceptable behaviour?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Ivan McKee
I have a final point that you might want to come back on. You mentioned, in your answer to Emma Harper, timing and prompt responses and the need to be able to react quickly if circumstances change. I am not sure that people would be queuing up and waiting for the new location then pouncing on it. However, assuming that that was the case and it was felt that those provisions needed to be in place, that would be a reason to have a ministerial directive rather than using a Scottish statutory instrument or whatever. However, you also talked about consultation. That would absolutely be the right thing to do, but consultation is a lengthy process.
It might be helpful if you were to comment on that now, although you might want to come back with indicative timelines and say why a process of due consultation would be prompt enough but a Scottish statutory instrument and due consultation would not.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Ivan McKee
In your view, would abortion services need to be mentioned in any signage, singing or whatever it was that was going on in order for it to fall foul of the legislation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Ivan McKee
I will touch on something that has come up about the trade union exemption. When you described the impact on women who are accessing services, you rightly referred to the issue of anonymity in certain areas. The fact that there is a lot of activity can be problematic and so on. The bill is designed to address the behaviour of those who seek to influence, prevent access to, or persuade people not to access, services.
11:30If we take a step back to look at that, there are hard-won trade union rights that are important for many reasons that we all agree on. However, an objective view is that the whole purpose of a peaceful picket is to stop people accessing, or persuade people not to access, services.
The bill balances competing rights. For the record, will you explain again how you see the difference between preventing people from accessing services, seeking to influence or persuading people not to access services on one hand and, on the other hand, the right to carry out activity that you could argue could be done elsewhere, as we have outlined with regard to anti-abortion protests? How do you characterise those competing rights and will you explain how they fit together?