The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1360 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Yes, and I think that we might want to reflect on the record that, if there is significantly more affordable housing in Scotland, that is perhaps no bad thing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
First, it is important to recognise that, if the money does not come from the developers, it would need to come from the capital budget—from the Scottish Government’s general taxation—or we would have to spend less on other public services. That is clearly the only alternative.
Regarding where the number came from, that is the amount that we would have received had we had a consequential share of the money that the UK Government is raising through its levy.
In relation to the specifics of the charge, there is scope, through secondary legislation, for ministers to decide the amount of the levy when we put it in place annually. Future ministers will be able to decide how much they want to raise from the levy.
As I say, the policy intent at this stage is to reflect the equivalent of what is intended to be raised by the levy in England.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
All of these are judgment calls, to be honest. We have gone through this and looked at the long list—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Exactly. Funds have indeed been put in to support the evaluation work to assess the extent of remediation that will be required.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
No; the funds that are raised from the levy, as the convener said, are a relatively small proportion of the total funds. The bulk of the lifting will be done by the Scottish Government’s capital budget.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
It is important to say that we all agree that the remediation has to be carried out. We will not know the full scale of remediation that is required until all the assessments are done, so at this stage we would not be able to put a final end date on it. We are working to an assessment at this stage that is based on the best available information, and that is broadly in line with the assessment that has been made south of the border. The ability to predict future technical challenges in building construction is probably outside the powers of Scottish Government ministers. There might be such challenges in the future, and it would be for future Governments to deal with them.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
That is about how Government budgets run. We have this conversation at other times about making sure that we use all the money that is available to meet the priorities of the people of Scotland. The idea that we would put that money in a biscuit tin and keep it there does not reflect the way that the finances work.
Looking at this at a macro level, it is understood that the total cost of the remediation will be far higher than the amount of money that is raised through the levy. By virtue of that fact alone, there is absolutely no doubt that everything that is raised through the levy will find its way towards remediation. Therefore, the mechanism by which you would do that hypothecation does not seem practical or necessary.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
There is robust data on the number of completions, so that is understood, and there is categorisation of that vis-à-vis the exemptions that we are talking about.
Officials can give more detail on the total market, but the difference was the period of time over which the average was taken. We have used a certain number of years to average the market size. Homes for Scotland is using a different number of years to average, and that is why we are seeing that difference. The effect of that is that we say that new build is 0.6 per cent of the total market size. If we used Homes for Scotland’s numbers, the average would be a slightly higher number, but it would still be in that range. It does not make a material difference to the size of the percentage of the total cost or the total size of the housing market.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
It is the same as the bill down south—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
It might do, but, as I have said, we do not have a crystal ball that tells us what building safety issues might or might not arise in the future. It would be up to future Governments and future Parliaments to take a view on that.
Did you want to comment, Hannah?