The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Ivan McKee
That is very helpful and lays out clearly a very important perspective.
Do any other witnesses have perspectives that they would like to share? Does anyone want to come in online?
I also want to ask about the issue of dual mandates. MSPs can hold another office as a councillor or as an MP. I would like to hear the panel’s views on how appropriate dual mandates are. Does Alice Kinghorn-Gray want to kick off on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
I will do my best.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Thank you. That is helpful. Who should make that call? Should there be wording that specifies what would need to pertain relating to public safety or whatever? What are your thoughts on that?
You also said that a longer postponement would be more helpful and effective than a shorter one, but there are other issues to consider. We have heard evidence about what would happen to postal votes, the electoral register and the timescale. A range of things would get worse with a longer postponement. What is your reflection on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
That is useful. Is there a requirement to specify rules on that, whether in the bill or in guidance, or is it sufficient to have on the shelf a manual that people might or might not refer to? I am thinking through a scenario in which difficult decisions would need to be made that might end up having a political slant—around postal votes that had already been cast, or on what would happen if somebody had spent most of their money and somebody else had spent hardly any because they were going to spend it in the second half of the campaign, for example. Would the counter be reset? Is there a need to nail that stuff down at this stage, so that people would not spend a lot of time having a big bun fight, if such a scenario were to transpire?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
That is very helpful. Thank you for clarifying that.
Technology is clearly moving on apace. I assume that you use tools for number crunching. Has any thought been given to use of—I dread to say it—artificial intelligence to analyse all the possible options and to do some optimisation, in order to give you a bit of a head start? Reviewing boundaries is, at one level, a very big and complicated mathematical problem, when we take into account all the factors that you mentioned.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Thank you, convener. Good morning, witnesses.
My question is about the provisions for postponement of elections in emergency situations. We have obviously had the Covid experience, which brought the matter into sharp focus. I want to hear your perspective on the need for, and desirability of, a provision to postpone elections, when that should happen and what issues it might raise for voters, campaigners or others.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Absolutely.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Maybe not.
My questions are about the process that you go through in order to decide what the boundaries should be. You can explain that for the record if you want, but I assume that it is all laid out in statute, guidance and so on.
Clearly, population drift, how you adjust for it and the limits within which you take account of that with regard to the numbers on the electoral roll, is an issue.
Do you take other factors into account, and, if so, how? One factor could be community, however you define it. Stability might be another factor, because clearly the relationships between an elected member and their constituents in local groups, schools and wherever else are built up over time and are important. Therefore, constantly making significant changes to boundaries would probably be unhelpful for everyone.
Another factor might be alignment with local government wards, in particular. For example, one ward being spread across three or four constituencies—or vice versa—would not be optimal.
Will you give me a sense of what the requirement is as laid out in statute, and in terms of your rules and guidance? How do you ensure that those issues are taken due account of in the process?
09:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Just for clarity, when you say “local authorities”, are you referring to local authority boundaries or local authority ward boundaries?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
So not the ward boundaries. I understand.