The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1144 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Absolutely.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Given that ministers are held accountable for that to the Parliament and the public, and were elected to do so, it is important that ministers are able to have an influence. If we end up in a place in which performance is not where it should be, it is important that ministers are able to engage proactively with a public body to ensure that we can resolve the situation.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
It is questions in the chamber from you, Mr Fraser.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Who was that evidence taken from?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
The answer is yes, in the sense that we are always looking for opportunities or examples of where that is the case. When I meet cabinet secretaries, I always ask to what extent they are considering the bodies under their portfolio, whether there are overlaps and whether there is scope for consolidation.
Another interesting point concerns overlaps between different portfolios. We tend to consider things in the portfolio space, but we can also ask what specific expertise a body brings to the public sector landscape. The body might have expertise in doing something that cuts across portfolios, such as making payments, gathering revenue or a specific function such as standard setting. We are also in the business of looking for opportunities where we can capitalise on the expertise that is out there and that public bodies can offer as a service to other public bodies, which means either that those other public bodies do not need to do it or that we can consolidate.
There is a job for Government there, and very much a job for public sector leaders. Nobody knows everything about all the 130-odd public bodies and what they are all doing, or what different people in different bits of those bodies are doing. There is absolutely a role for public sector leaders to engage, and many of them are very proactive in that space.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
That is up to the Parliament, if it wants to make that case. Are you referring to capacity in terms of the number of MSPs or committees, or the amount of time that committees spend on specific things? In what sense are you talking about capacity?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
No—it is up to the Parliament to figure out what it needs to do.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
The officials can correct me if I am wrong, but I suppose that if the organisation employs staff, has a building and a budget, is spending money and has accounts, it can clearly be audited as an entity. If we are talking about an inspector or a group that does not have that back-office support—its support is provided by the Government—and does not run its own budget line per se, that will be consolidated in the Government accounts and the process will be different. That would be the determining factor as to which category the body would sit in, but the level of scrutiny through whatever route should be just as effective.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Not specifically with regard to audit, but more generally with regard to reporting requirements and information gathering. We are working through the public sector reform strategy with public bodies to see whether there are opportunities to make the requirements more proportionate and effective and to ensure that we are gathering the right information and checking the right things in order to make a difference, not just collecting information for the sake of it or going through processes that add cost but no value.
If there are any examples of audit falling into that category, I will be willing to look at them. However, we need to bear it in mind that audit has, for very good reasons, its own regime in terms of the legal processes that we need to go through: what we need to check, why we need to check it and how we need to do it.
Do you want to add anything, Aileen?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Well, those working in the relevant portfolio—such as communities, equalities or whatever—would obviously have a close relationship with those bodies, as well as with relevant stakeholders, which would allow them to take a view. The matter that you raise is not something that I am personally aware of. If there is a specific issue, we can check in with the relevant portfolio and write back to you.