The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1454 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
We are trying to change as little as possible, because the more we touch, the more we risk breaking something or creating unintended consequences. It would potentially become a bit complicated to put in place a scenario where we referred to inflation rates and said, “Based on this scenario, you can do this, and based on that scenario, you can do that.” We want to avoid a situation where automatic uprating leads us into a world where we get some strange and non-rounded numbers being used, because that would not be helpful. We are giving some thought to what that should look like.
I imagine that, in the real world, local authorities will look at the matter and uprate their charges every three or four years, as they do with other charges in their control. We are open to a simple mechanism that allows that to be a straightforward process that they can implement. We need to allow some running time for businesses to be able to change systems and understand what is coming down the track, but it absolutely would not make sense for that to be an 18-month period, which would take us from one financial year into the next one and the one after that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
I am delving into the technicalities here, but officials will keep me right. The bill will allow a local authority to have different charging approaches in different parts of the local authority area or for different types of accommodation, but it would not allow a situation in which the same accommodation unit was charged on both bases at the same time.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Potentially, yes, but the same accommodation provider would not be charged on both bases.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
That is correct, but it is important to recognise that that would require the council to decide that that was a wise thing to do.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
There has been engagement with stakeholders, as you would expect, to pull together what is in the financial memorandum. We have indicated that there are a number of areas where there will be amendments at later stages, and that some of the parameters are still to be defined as we hear evidence from different stakeholders. As you would expect, the financial memorandum will evolve. There has been engagement but, at this point, the memorandum reflects our best appraisal of the numbers. They will change, depending on how the parameters that are in the bill change.
10:45
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
I will let officials speak about the technical aspects, but, as I indicated earlier, a business would not find itself in a position in which it would be subject to both simultaneously.
At this point, I will bring in a lawyer.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Like everything in the process, there are challenges, which we need to address based on evidence. I see the challenges that it presents. Officials can keep me right, but if I am not mistaken, charges for the per-person, per-night option would be based on the accommodation’s capacity rather than the number of people who take it up. Is that right, David?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Yes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Officials can keep me right on the technicalities, but local authorities have the ability to do that themselves. In the scenarios that you are painting, local authorities would have that power, and they will be able to judge whether they want to use that locally.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
No. Local authorities have the ability to add further exemptions if they decide that that makes sense locally. That is the right approach, because it gives them that flexibility. The regulations are about a technical issue in the disability exemptions, which clarifies the definition of the scope. David Storrie might want to talk to that.