The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1644 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Ivan McKee
It depends very much on the sector and what the product is. If Indian businesses were bidding for construction contracts in the Scottish public sector, it is clear that the delivery of those contracts would involve a workforce based in Scotland. If they are manufacturing products on the global market, they will typically be competing with other global suppliers of those products. If the contract was for local services, you would expect local businesses to be in a much better place to provide those. Of course, we need to take into account transport, logistics, cost, times and a range of other factors that affect the decision on where the procurement happens.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Yes.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Ivan McKee
I can certainly give feedback on the analysis that we take forward. As I said, the UK Government has done analysis as part of the negotiations. I will check how much we have access to and will provide what we have.
On the impact on Scottish SMEs, all that you would see is whether there was any increase in the number of Indian businesses winning contracts and who else could have won the contracts otherwise, which might well have been another global supplier or a large UK or Scottish business, or it might have been an SME. It would be difficult to unpick that, but I will certainly sit with officials and see what work we have in train that is able to address that issue.
On procurement in general, you have to recognise that, as I indicated to the committee, 47 per cent of our £16.5 billion public sector spend in Scotland is with SMEs, so we have a very strong record of placing contracts with SMEs and with Scottish SMEs in particular.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Separate legislation would be needed if we chose to take those forward.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
We have been through a consultation process on the cruise ship levy that is being considered and analysed as we speak. Clearly, with an election coming up, that would fall into the post-election period. Any future Government will look at the consultation and its results and decide how it wants to proceed.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
I would be happy to take evidence on that and consider it. However, to go back to the point that we made earlier about proportionality in the scheme, if some people are paying £300 or £400 a night for a hotel room—or even more—where would that national cap be set? We need to be cognisant of the fact that a national cap could, to some extent, militate against proportionality on very expensive accommodation. We are interested to hear views on a cap, but it is more complicated than the assumption that that would keep prices down for those in lower-priced accommodation.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Fiona, do you want to say anything?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
At the core of the bill is the ability for local authorities to operate a tiered flat-rate system instead of, or alongside, a percentage-based system. That has the benefit of increasing flexibility and simplicity. Businesses were calling out for local authorities to have the ability to implement a flat-rate system where they felt it was the right thing to do. As I say, that is the core change that we are making. It gives local authorities more scope in designing the levy, but it also allows businesses to engage with local authorities through the consultation and make the case for a fixed-rate system where they feel it is more appropriate.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Sorry, are you asking about the three sets of regulations?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Absolutely. It will depend on local circumstances, because the visitor economy is different throughout the country. If you are a business, you are typically operating in one part of the country—you are a chain hotel, a campsite, a bed and breakfast or whatever. From your perspective, the system is simple in the sense that what affects you is within certain bounds and is typically likely to be either one flat rate or a percentage, regardless of what is happening in other parts of the visitor economy locally.
From a visitor’s perspective, anyone who has travelled in Europe or further afield will be used to paying a levy. I do not think that I have ever got exercised about the fact that, when I go to Paris, the levy is different from what it is in Amsterdam. Frankly, it is not something that most visitors would even think about, never mind get confused about. From that perspective, the bill offers changes, such as more flexibility for local authorities. It also allows simpler systems to be operated for businesses in certain tiers of the economy, where appropriate.