The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1632 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
Please correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that, at the moment, a parent has a right to ask for Gaelic-medium education for their child, but there is not a right for it to be provided. In the evidence that we have heard, calls have been made for there to be a right to Gaelic-medium education. I am absolutely sympathetic to the ambition to establish such a right, but I think that, in legislating in this Parliament, we need to be increasingly mindful of the need to ensure that we create rights that can be realised. I pose that as an issue that needs to be considered when capacity is a challenge.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
Good morning to you and all your officials, Deputy First Minister. I want to move to the area of Gaelic-medium education, which is covered in sections 11 to 25 in chapter 2 of the bill. We heard evidence about the challenges that parents who seek Gaelic-medium education face. I have Edinburgh’s GME primary school in my constituency and I used to work at Edinburgh’s GME secondary school before I was elected. Could, and should, the process for parents who seek Gaelic-medium education be simplified?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
There is the hurdle of capacity, which is challenged in a growing city such as Edinburgh.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
Absolutely.
Earlier, you spoke about the overall ambition. Do you think that the bill will support Gaelic-medium education pupils having wider opportunities to use Gaelic in their homes and communities? How will it increase what you described as the breadth and the depth of Gaelic?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
In relation to employment and the workplace, you could apply that same argument to Scots.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
I will touch on another issue. There was a discussion about the economy earlier. One of the benefits that I know about from my constituency work is that young people who learn Gaelic also develop skills that help them to learn a number of other languages, which not only gives them the benefit of learning Gaelic but enables them to learn more languages, which in turn helps with their economic contribution and the opportunities available to them later on. In considering young people learning languages more widely, should education authorities prioritise Gaelic as a modern language over other modern languages, or not?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
In our evidence, we heard feedback on higher education. Will the Government use the powers under the bill to improve the provision of Gaelic-medium further and higher education?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
Will the minister take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you, convener. I thought that the minister might speak first, so I apologise, minister, if this covers some of the things that you might want to say.
Mr Simpson has brought some important points to the debate. Having heard the voice of small business during the stage 1 proceedings, we should consider what impact charges for single-use items would have on small businesses when they are in competition with larger companies—sometimes multinational companies. That could prove to be difficult in that single-use item charges—for example, on coffee cups—would disincentivise people to purchase on the go and would create a logistical challenge for smaller businesses.
That said, I think that the Government is right to want to take that power in a piece of primary legislation. The considerations thereafter would be on deployment and utilisation of the power. I know that the Government, and future Governments, would be careful and cautious about impacts on businesses when utilising the power. Therefore, there is a debate to be had on when and for what that power should be used. As things stand, it is important to take that power in a circular economy bill, but I urge the Government and future Governments to think carefully about putting the cost and emphasis of creating a circular economy on to the individual consumer, rather than on to businesses.
I thank Mr Simpson for lodging the amendments, but I urge him not to move them at this juncture and to have further dialogue with the Government to see whether there is a better position that can consensually be arrived at for stage 3.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Ben Macpherson
Does Graham Simpson agree that, as we discussed at stage 1, it is important to consider single-use item charges with regard to the particular circumstances of different items? For example, the charge on plastic bags was, from memory, more to do with the damaging effect of plastic bags as a pollutant in the natural environment—whether in rivers or woodland, or from wildlife choking on plastic. A disposable cup is a different item. For consumers, putting a reusable bag in their pocket is a different consideration from putting a reusable cup in their pocket. We would all do well to consider the circumstances of different items, rather than being wide-ranging in using the plastic bag charge as a justification for saying that charging would be beneficial when it comes to other single-use items.