The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1264 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Who wants to take that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Absolutely. Lorna Slater, did you want to add anything further?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Do any examples stand out for you?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I appreciate that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I suggested a piece of legislation because many of the commissioners have been created out of primary legislation.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
As there are no further comments on those matters, I will bring in Richard Leonard.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will ask a question before I move on to Ash Regan. You talked about a definition, and there were good questions from colleagues about how the landscape could be made simpler and easier to understand and how it could be better structured. Is there a possibility that we need a consolidation act to bring this all together, to reform it, and to strategise so that it is all more coherent? I am aware that, particularly with reserved legislation in years past, consolidation acts have helped to tidy the landscape. Is there a need for that here in Scotland? That is quite a broad question.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will bring in Lorna Slater in a second, but I have a question for Dr Gill or the other witnesses that follows up on that point. Do you have any thoughts on whether there should be sunset clauses? For example, should there be a review after five years of whether the body is performing its functions and is still needed? Should there be a periodic evaluation?
In our previous evidence sessions, the possibility has been raised not just of holding more frequent scrutiny sessions with parliamentary committees and creating the capacity for that, as Alison Payne rightly touched on, but of whether there would be a benefit in having a new committee dedicated to the scrutiny of SPCB bodies—or whether there are other models that we should explore.
Lorna, do you want to add a supplementary question to that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Okay. Do any of the witnesses have thoughts on my question? Let us perhaps start with Dr Gill.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am thinking particularly about the fact that the bill was amended at stage 2 just last week. I am conscious that I sit on the Criminal Justice Committee, too, and that our job today is to talk broadly and not about one proposition, but that was interesting and helpful, and I thought that it was important to give that wider context. If you were able to follow up on anything, I am sure that Parliament would be interested in that ahead of stage 3. We are also interested in what you have said today with regard to the remit and task that this committee is undertaking, so thank you very much.
Lorna Slater has a follow-up question on what we have just discussed.