The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1637 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Okay. Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is helpful. It is important to acknowledge the wider context and the work that is on-going there.
We have seen the success of the pilot, and there seems to be consensus among the witnesses that the pilot has been positive and has had good outcomes, and that good progress is being made.
In relation to the bill that is in front of us, my colleague Liam Kerr emphasised the issue of finance, and Mr Graham and Superintendent Thomas made some points about practicalities. As well as finance and resourcing, I think that we need to think about time. It would be helpful for the committee to know, now or as a follow-up, whether you think that the commencement provisions in section 28 of the bill are appropriate. I asked last week’s witnesses the same question. If you do not think that they are appropriate, what, in your view, would be a realistic commencement date that would enable all parties involved to ensure that they had worked through the practicalities, created the infrastructure and appropriately organised the facilities so that the bill could be implemented in the right way?
10:45Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is helpful. It is important to acknowledge the wider context and the work that is on-going there.
We have seen the success of the pilot, and there seems to be consensus among the witnesses that the pilot has been positive and has had good outcomes, and that good progress is being made.
In relation to the bill that is in front of us, my colleague Liam Kerr emphasised the issue of finance, and Mr Graham and Superintendent Thomas made some points about practicalities. As well as finance and resourcing, I think that we need to think about time. It would be helpful for the committee to know, now or as a follow-up, whether you think that the commencement provisions in section 28 of the bill are appropriate. I asked last week’s witnesses the same question. If you do not think that they are appropriate, what, in your view, would be a realistic commencement date that would enable all parties involved to ensure that they had worked through the practicalities, created the infrastructure and appropriately organised the facilities so that the bill could be implemented in the right way?
10:45Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
It sounds as though, rather than struggling to be able to deliver it, you would not be able to do so.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you very much, all of you. That was really helpful for our evidence taking.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I have two questions to follow up on some of the points that have been raised by colleagues. First, it is important to note that the points that Sharon Dowey raised about police officer time also apply to expert witness time. It is important for us to keep in mind that other initiatives are on-going to have the Crown and the defence agree more evidence in advance to reduce the necessity for police officers and other witnesses to attend court.
I see nodding heads, so I presume that that is taken as read, but it is important to acknowledge that for our wider consideration and for the record.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Is there anything else that Richard Thomas or Emma Forbes would like to add?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
It is helpful feedback.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
You are obviously far more experienced in those matters than I am but, based on what you have said and what we heard last week, I wonder whether there is a compromise position. For example, could there be an opportunity for defence solicitors to examine the item or to make a decision within three months of the date of charge, before the physical item is destroyed and photographs are used instead? Do we need to give further consideration to that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
My question is on part 1, and concerns digital productions, which we did not get to earlier.
At last week’s meeting, we discussed with witnesses whether, in situations in which an image is used in evidence instead of a physical item, that item will be retained to allow the defence to access it and whether it would be retained until the case is concluded and any appeal is dealt with. Do you have a view on that matter?