The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1601 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Is there anything else that Richard Thomas or Emma Forbes would like to add?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
It is helpful feedback.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
You are obviously far more experienced in those matters than I am but, based on what you have said and what we heard last week, I wonder whether there is a compromise position. For example, could there be an opportunity for defence solicitors to examine the item or to make a decision within three months of the date of charge, before the physical item is destroyed and photographs are used instead? Do we need to give further consideration to that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
My question is on part 1, and concerns digital productions, which we did not get to earlier.
At last week’s meeting, we discussed with witnesses whether, in situations in which an image is used in evidence instead of a physical item, that item will be retained to allow the defence to access it and whether it would be retained until the case is concluded and any appeal is dealt with. Do you have a view on that matter?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
As well as thinking about funding, my request to you is that you help us to think about time. You do not necessarily need to do this today, but as we move forward in the bill process, it would be useful for the committee to know whether you can give a more definitive position on what a reasonable timeframe for commencement would be.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the first meeting in 2025 of the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee. I have received no apologies for today’s meeting.
Agenda item 1 is a declaration of interests. I welcome Richard Leonard MSP to his first meeting of the committee and invite him to declare any relevant interests.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you, Richard.
As was previously agreed by the committee, we will move into private session to discuss our work programme.
09:30 Meeting continued in private until 10:49.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
How much time do you need to work through the challenges?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which shows that I am registered on the roll of Scottish solicitors at the Law Society of Scotland.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
On the general issues that we have been discussing, part 1 of the bill sets out two new provisions that aim to support digital innovation in the criminal justice system. The first of those concerns the use of digital productions in criminal proceedings. Would you like to say anything further about those provisions? For example, are there any issues that you have not already raised that need to be resolved to ensure that processes work fairly and efficiently?